| Literature DB >> 16595004 |
Keshav K Singh1, Mohamed M Desouki, Renty B Franklin, Leslie C Costello.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In prostate cancer, normal citrate-producing glandular secretory epithelial cells undergo a metabolic transformation to malignant citrate-oxidizing cells. m-Aconitase is the critical step involved in this altered citrate metabolism that is essential to prostate malignancy. The limiting m-aconitase activity in prostate epithelial cells could be the result of a decreased level of m-aconitase enzyme and/or the inhibition of existing m-aconitase. Earlier studies identified zinc as an inhibitor of m-aconitase activity in prostate cells; and that the depletion of zinc in malignant cells is an important factor in this metabolic transformation. However, a possibility remains that an altered expression and level of m-aconitase enzyme might also be involved in this metabolic transformation. To address this issue, the in situ level of m-aconitase enzyme was determined by immunohistochemical analysis of prostate cancer tissue sections and malignant prostate cell lines.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2006 PMID: 16595004 PMCID: PMC1484490 DOI: 10.1186/1476-4598-5-14
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Cancer ISSN: 1476-4598 Impact factor: 27.401
Figure 1Subcellular localization of m-aconitase. A-D. Immunofluorescent detection. LNCaP prostate cell line was probed with Mitotracker then fixed for immunofluorescence with Aconitase-2 Ab and visualized by Laser Scanning Confocal Microscope. A. no staining of either in nuclei (DAPI). B. red punctuate mitochondrial staining in cytoplasm (Mitotracker). C. green fluorescent of m-aconitase in cytoplasm (FITC). D. red and green fluorescence merge shows co-localization of m-aconitase in mitochondria. E. Immunocytochemical detection of m-aconitase. Note the dark brown punctuate mitochondrial staining in cytoplasm; and well defined clear nucleus.
Figure 2Representative m-aconitase immunohistochemistry of human prostate tissue sections. Left panel. A. Negative control. B. Field that shows adjacent BPH and malignant foci. C. Field showing adjacent PIN and malignant glands. Right panel. A-D are H&E staining; a-d are immunohistochemical staining. Note strong brown positive staining of glandular epithelium in all cases; and contrasting less staining of stroma.
Aconitase immunoreactivity of BPH glandular epithelumversus adenocarcinomatous glands of prostate cancer tissue sections.
| TUMOR | ACONITASE IMMUNOREACTIVITY | ZIP1 IMMUNOREACTIVITY | |||
| CASE # | GRADE | BPH | PCA | BPH | Malignant |
| 1 | 3 | +++ 8.9 | ++ 6.4 | ++ | Negative |
| 2 | 3 | + 6.4 | +++ 11.0 | ++ | + |
| 3 | 1 | + 6.2 | + 7.0 | + | Negative |
| 4 | 2 | +++ 14.6 | +++ 12.2 | + | Negative |
| 5 | 2 | ++ 12.6 | + 14.2 | Negative | Negative |
| 6 | 1 | +++ 12.2 | +++ 16.6 | ++ | Negative |
| 7 | 2 | ++ 10.0 | +++ 15.6 | + | + |
| 8 | 1 | +++ 11.4 | ++ 8.3 | ++ | + |
| 9 | 1 | + 7.5 | +++ 18.0 | ++ | Negative |
| 10 | 2 | + 8.4 | + 8.6 | ++ | Negative |
| 11 | 1 | + 12.6 | ++ 11.8 | ++ | Negative |
| 12 | 2 | + 9.7 | +++ 15.8 | Negative | Negative |
| 13 | 1 | +++ 13.7 | +++ 14.2 | ++ | + |
| 14 | 1 | +++ 13.9 | +++ 14.5 | + | Negative |
| 15 | 1 | + 7.6 | + 10.2 | + | Negative |
| 16 | 1 | ++ 11.6 | +++ 13.9 | + | Negative |
| 17 | 1 | ++ 14.2 | +++ 16.3 | ++ | + |
| 18 | 1 | ++ 9.2 | ++ 10.0 | + | Negative |
| 19 | 1 | +++ 12.0 | ++ 10.9 | + | Negative |
| 20 | 2 | +++ 14.7 | +++ 18.2 | ++ | + |
| 21 | 1 | +++ 14.1 | +++ 17.6 | Negative | Negative |
| 22 | 3 | +++ 16.3 | +++ 17.9 | ------------- | ------------- |
| t-TEST- MEAN(SE) | |||||
| POSITIVITY | 2.1(0.85) | 2.4(0.94)** | 1.68(0.23) | 0.32(0.10)* | |
| QUANTITATION | 11.3(2.9) | 13. 1(3.8)** | ------------- | ------------- | |
Scoring of immunoreactivity: Negative, no positive cells;
score +, <10% positive cells; score ++, 10–50% positive cells;
score +++, > 50% positive cells.
Quantitation = Average number of well defined ACON IHC dots per cell.
Mean Positivity = sum of +'s/22
ZIP1 data taken from Franklin et al [14].
BPH vs Malignant *P < 0.01; **no significant difference
Figure 3Western blot analysis of m-aconitase levels in human prostate cancer cell lines. The cells were exposed for 24 hours to medium supplemented with 15 uM zinc and to unsupplemented medium.