Literature DB >> 16594768

The meaning and suitability of various effect sizes for structured Rater x Ratee designs.

Johannes Hönekopp1, Betsy Jane Becker, Frederick L Oswald.   

Abstract

Four types of analysis are commonly applied to data from structured Rater x Ratee designs. These types are characterized by the unit of analysis, which is either raters or ratees, and by the design used, which is either between-units or within-unit design. The 4 types of analysis are quite different, and therefore they give rise to effect sizes that differ in their substantive interpretations. In most cases, effect sizes based on between-ratee analysis have the least ambiguous meaning and will best serve the aims of meta-analysts and primary researchers. Effect sizes that arise from within-unit designs confound the strength of an effect with its homogeneity. Nonetheless, the authors identify how a range of effect-size types such as these serve the aims of meta-analysis appropriately. ((c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16594768     DOI: 10.1037/1082-989X.11.1.72

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Methods        ISSN: 1082-989X


  2 in total

1.  A New Method for Re-Analyzing Evaluation Bias: Piecewise Growth Curve Modeling Reveals an Asymmetry in the Evaluation of Pro and Con Arguments.

Authors:  Jens Jirschitzka; Joachim Kimmerle; Ulrike Cress
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  A case against default effect sizes in sport and exercise science.

Authors:  Aaron Caldwell; Andrew D Vigotsky
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 2.984

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.