Literature DB >> 1659322

Comparison of the nuclear and cytosolic forms of the Ah receptor from Hepa 1c1c7 cells: charge heterogeneity and ATP binding properties.

G H Perdew1.   

Abstract

2-[125I]iodo-7,8-dibromo-p-dioxin ([125I]Br2DpD) and 2-[125I]iodo-3-azido-7,8-dibromo-p-dioxin ([125I]N3Br2-DpD) are both capable of binding to the Ah receptor (AhR) with a high degree of specificity in cultured Hepa 1c1c7 cells. After incubation with either [125I]N3Br2DpD or [125I]Br2DpD Hepa 1c1c7 cytosolic and high salt nuclear extracts were analyzed by sucrose density gradient analysis with the following results: (i) With both radioligands an approximately 9 S form of the AhR was observed in cytosolic extracts. (ii) Nuclear extracts labeled with [125I]N3Br2DpD revealed both approximately 6 S and approximately 9 S forms of the AhR. (iii) In contrast, analysis of nuclear extracts labeled with [125I]Br2DpD revealed only an approximately 6 S form of the AhR. The approximately 9 S [125I]N3Br2DpD-labeled AhR was preferentially extracted with 100 mM KCl from a nuclear fraction and mixed with monoclonal antibody 8D3, an anti-90-kDa heat shock protein antibody. Monoclonal antibody 8D3 was able to bind to the approximately 9 S nuclear form of the AhR and caused the receptor to sediment as a heavier complex on sucrose density gradients. This would indicate that the AhR can reside in the nucleus bound to 90-kDa heat shock protein. The [125I]N3Br2DpD-labeled approximately 6 S peak fractions were collected and subjected to denaturing two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. A comparison of [125I]N3Br2DpD-labeled cytosolic (9 S) AhR preparations with the nuclear (6 S) AhR by 2-D gel electrophoresis was performed. The cytosolic form of the AhR was present in the apparent pI range of 5.2-5.7; the nuclear form focused between 5.5 and 6.2. The [125I]N3Br2DpD-labeled nuclear extracts were incubated with ATP-agarose and 43% of the photoaffinity-labeled AhR bound to the affinity gel. In contrast, approximately threefold lower binding of [125I]N3Br2DpD-labeled receptor was obtained when GTP-, AMP-, or ADP-agarose was used. Only 2% of the [125I]N3Br2DpD-labeled cytosolic AhR was able to bind to ATP-agarose. These results suggest that after the AhR translocates into the nucleus the following biochemical changes occur: (i) The sedimentation value for the AhR changes from an approximately 9 S to an approximately 6 S species. (ii) The AhR attains the ability to bind with specificity to ATP. (iii) The AhR undergoes a shift to a more basic pI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1659322     DOI: 10.1016/0003-9861(91)90136-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys        ISSN: 0003-9861            Impact factor:   4.013


  8 in total

1.  Carboxyl terminus of hsc70-interacting protein (CHIP) can remodel mature aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) complexes and mediate ubiquitination of both the AhR and the 90 kDa heat-shock protein (hsp90) in vitro.

Authors:  J Luis Morales; Gary H Perdew
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 3.162

2.  Role of the Per/Arnt/Sim domains in ligand-dependent transformation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor.

Authors:  Anatoly Soshilov; Michael S Denison
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Modulation of aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR)-dependent signaling by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor β/δ (PPARβ/δ) in keratinocytes.

Authors:  Michael G Borland; Prasad Krishnan; Christina Lee; Prajakta P Albrecht; Weiwei Shan; Moses T Bility; Craig B Marcus; Jyh M Lin; Shantu Amin; Frank J Gonzalez; Gary H Perdew; Jeffrey M Peters
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 4.944

Review 4.  The aryl hydrocarbon receptor complex and the control of gene expression.

Authors:  Timothy V Beischlag; J Luis Morales; Brett D Hollingshead; Gary H Perdew
Journal:  Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.807

5.  The mouse and human Ah receptor differ in recognition of LXXLL motifs.

Authors:  Colin Flaveny; Rashmeet K Reen; Ann Kusnadi; Gary H Perdew
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  2008-01-26       Impact factor: 4.013

6.  Identification of functional domains of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator protein (ARNT).

Authors:  S Reisz-Porszasz; M R Probst; B N Fukunaga; O Hankinson
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  Transitional States in Ligand-Dependent Transformation of the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor into Its DNA-Binding Form.

Authors:  Anatoly A Soshilov; Stefano Motta; Laura Bonati; Michael S Denison
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  The mechanism of dioxin toxicity: relationship to risk assessment.

Authors:  L S Birnbaum
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 9.031

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.