Literature DB >> 16592299

Bounds for a joint distribution function with fixed sub-distribution functions: Application to competing risks.

A V Peterson1.   

Abstract

This paper gives sharp bounds for the joint survival function G(t(1), t(2),...,t(r)) identical with P(X(1) > t(1), X(2) > t(2),...,X(r) > t(r)), and for the marginal survival functions S(j)(t) identical with P(X(j) > t), j = 1,2,...,r, when the sub-survival functions S(j) (*)(t) identical with P(X(j) > t, X(j) = min(k=1,2),...,(r)X(k)) are fixed. Theorem 1 gives the bounds for r = 2, and Theorem 2 gives the bounds for general r. Theorem 3 applies the result to the competing risks problem, and presents empirical bounds based on the observations. Finally, an example illustrates the bounds.

Entities:  

Year:  1976        PMID: 16592299      PMCID: PMC335828          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.73.1.11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  1 in total

1.  A nonidentifiability aspect of the problem of competing risks.

Authors:  A Tsiatis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1975-01       Impact factor: 11.205

  1 in total
  16 in total

1.  Profile Likelihood and Incomplete Data.

Authors:  Zhiwei Zhang
Journal:  Int Stat Rev       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 2.217

2.  Bounds on the covariate-time transformation for competing-risks survival analysis.

Authors:  Simon J Bond; J Ewart H Shaw
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2006-08-18       Impact factor: 1.588

3.  The protective impact of a covariate on competing failures with an example from a bone marrow transplantation study.

Authors:  C Di Serio
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 1.588

4.  A test for independence of competing risks with discrete failure times.

Authors:  M Crowder
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 1.588

5.  An analytic method for randomized trials with informative censoring: Part 1.

Authors:  J M Robins
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.588

Review 6.  Statistical methods for dependent competing risks.

Authors:  M L Moeschberger; J P Klein
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.588

7.  On assessing independence of competing risks when failure times are discrete.

Authors:  M Crowder
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 1.588

8.  Sensitivity of the discrete-time Kaplan-Meier estimate to nonignorable censoring: Application in a clinical trial.

Authors:  Tao Liu; Daniel F Heitjan
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Dose-response curves and competing risks.

Authors:  P G Groer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Dependent competing risks: a stochastic process model.

Authors:  A I Yashin; K G Manton; E Stallard
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.259

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.