Literature DB >> 16586237

Comparison of cervical volume and cervical length to predict preterm delivery by transvaginal ultrasound.

Talat Umut Kutlu Dilek1, Ayfer Gurbuz, Gurkan Yazici, Murat Arslan, Sitki Gulhan, Ozlem Pata, Saffet Dilek.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate predictive value of cervical volume and length measurement for preterm delivery in low-risk pregnancies by transvaginal ultrasound. Two hundred fifty pregnant women were underwent ultrasound examination at 22 weeks of gestation by transvaginal route. Cervical length, width, and anteroposterior diameters were measured and cervical volume was calculated. All subjects were observed until term. Predictive values of cervical length and cervical volume were calculated and compared with predict preterm delivery. Preterm delivery occurred in 18 patients (7.2%). Mean cervical length and volume were statistically different between term and preterm delivered patients ( P = 0.001). Areas under curves were 0.913 for cervical volume and 0.923 for cervical length; this difference was not statistically significant ( P = 0.289). Sensitivity of cervical volume was 73.3% for 32-mL cut-off value with 12.85% false-positive rate and cervical length had 80% sensitivity at the 33.15-mm cut-off value with 12.7% false-positive rate. Cervical volume measurement by two-dimensional ultrasound did not add any benefit compared with the cervical length measurement for prediction of preterm delivery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16586237     DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-934102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Perinatol        ISSN: 0735-1631            Impact factor:   1.862


  3 in total

1.  Comparison of cervical parameters by three-dimensional ultrasound according to parity and previous delivery mode.

Authors:  Yun Sung Jo; Dong Gyu Jang; Narinay Kim; Sa Jin Kim; Guisera Lee
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 3.738

2.  Cervical length distribution among Brazilian pregnant population and risk factors for short cervix: A multicenter cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Kaline Gomes Ferrari Marquart; Thais Valeria Silva; Ben W Mol; José Guilherme Cecatti; Renato Passini; Cynara M Pereira; Thaísa B Guedes; Tatiana F Fanton; Rodolfo C Pacagnella
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Three-dimensional volumetric gray-scale uterine cervix histogram prediction of days to delivery in full term pregnancy.

Authors:  Ji Youn Kim; Hai-Joong Kim; Meong Hi Hahn; Hye Jin Jeon; Geum Joon Cho; Sun Chul Hong; Min Jeong Oh
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2013-09-14
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.