Literature DB >> 16585219

Activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase in estrogen receptor alpha-positive breast cancer cells in vitro induces an in vivo molecular phenotype of estrogen receptor alpha-negative human breast tumors.

Chad J Creighton1, Amy M Hilger, Shalini Murthy, James M Rae, Arul M Chinnaiyan, Dorraya El-Ashry.   

Abstract

Breast cancer presents as either estrogen receptor alpha (ERalpha) positive or negative, with ERalpha+ tumors responding to antiestrogen therapy and having a better prognosis. By themselves, mRNA expression signatures of estrogen regulation in ERalpha+ breast cancer cells do not account for the vast molecular differences observed between ERalpha+ and ERalpha- cancers. In ERalpha- tumors, overexpression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) or c-erbB-2, leading to increased growth factor signaling, is observed such that mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase (MAPK) is significantly hyperactivated compared with ERalpha+ breast cancer. In ERalpha+/progesterone receptor-positive, estrogen-dependent MCF-7 breast cancer cells, we stably overexpressed EGFR or constitutively active erbB-2, Raf, or MAP/extracellular signal-regulated kinase kinase, resulting in cell lines exhibiting hyperactivation of MAPK, estrogen-independent growth, and the reversible down-regulation of ERalpha expression. By global mRNA profiling, we found a "MAPK signature" of approximately 400 genes consistently up-regulated or down-regulated in each of the MAPK+ cell lines. In several independent profile data sets of human breast tumors, the in vitro MAPK signature was able to accurately distinguish ER+ from ER- tumors. In addition, our in vitro mRNA profile data revealed distinct mRNA signatures specific to either erbB-2 or EGFR activation. A subset of breast tumor profiles was found to share extensive similarities with either the erbB-2-specific or the EGFR-specific signatures. Our results confirm that increased MAPK activation causes loss of ERalpha expression and suggest that hyperactivation of MAPK plays a role in the generation of the ERalpha- phenotype in breast cancer. These MAPK+ cell lines are excellent models for investigating the underlying mechanisms behind the ERalpha- phenotype.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16585219     DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-4363

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  118 in total

Review 1.  Intrinsic and Extrinsic Factors Governing the Transcriptional Regulation of ESR1.

Authors:  David K Lung; Rebecca M Reese; Elaine T Alarid
Journal:  Horm Cancer       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 3.869

Review 2.  Does lapatinib work against HER2-negative breast cancers?

Authors:  Ingrid A Mayer; Carlos L Arteaga
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  Epigenetic Reactivation of Estrogen Receptor: Promising Tools for Restoring Response to Endocrine Therapy.

Authors:  Neeraj K Saxena; Dipali Sharma
Journal:  Mol Cell Pharmacol       Date:  2010

Review 4.  Mechanisms of aromatase inhibitor resistance.

Authors:  Cynthia X Ma; Tomás Reinert; Izabela Chmielewska; Matthew J Ellis
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 60.716

5.  Estrogen receptor-α36 is involved in development of acquired tamoxifen resistance via regulating the growth status switch in breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Guangliang Li; Jing Zhang; Ketao Jin; Kuifeng He; Yi Zheng; Xin Xu; Haohao Wang; Haiyong Wang; Zhongqi Li; Xiongfei Yu; Xiaodong Teng; Jiang Cao; Lisong Teng
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 6.603

6.  Proteomic and transcriptomic profiling reveals a link between the PI3K pathway and lower estrogen-receptor (ER) levels and activity in ER+ breast cancer.

Authors:  Chad J Creighton; Xiaoyong Fu; Bryan T Hennessy; Angelo J Casa; Yiqun Zhang; Ana Maria Gonzalez-Angulo; Ana Lluch; Joe W Gray; Powell H Brown; Susan G Hilsenbeck; C Kent Osborne; Gordon B Mills; Adrian V Lee; Rachel Schiff
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 6.466

7.  Comparative expression pathway analysis of human and canine mammary tumors.

Authors:  Paolo Uva; Luigi Aurisicchio; James Watters; Andrey Loboda; Amit Kulkarni; John Castle; Fabio Palombo; Valentina Viti; Giuseppe Mesiti; Valentina Zappulli; Laura Marconato; Francesca Abramo; Gennaro Ciliberto; Armin Lahm; Nicola La Monica; Emanuele de Rinaldis
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-03-27       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  Knowledge driven decomposition of tumor expression profiles.

Authors:  Martin H van Vliet; Lodewyk F A Wessels; Marcel J T Reinders
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Can systems biology understand pathway activation? Gene expression signatures as surrogate markers for understanding the complexity of pathway activation.

Authors:  Hiraku Itadani; Shinji Mizuarai; Hidehito Kotani
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.236

10.  The rapamycin-regulated gene expression signature determines prognosis for breast cancer.

Authors:  Argun Akcakanat; Li Zhang; Spiridon Tsavachidis; Funda Meric-Bernstam
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 27.401

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.