AIM: To review quantitative studies of safety climate in health care to examine the psychometric properties of the questionnaires designed to measure this construct. METHOD: A systematic literature review was undertaken to study sample and questionnaire design characteristics (source, no of items, scale type), construct validity (content validity, factor structure and internal reliability, concurrent validity), within group agreement, and level of analysis. RESULTS: Twelve studies were examined. There was a lack of explicit theoretical underpinning for most questionnaires and some instruments did not report standard psychometric criteria. Where this information was available, several questionnaires appeared to have limitations. CONCLUSIONS: More consideration should be given to psychometric factors in the design of healthcare safety climate instruments, especially as these are beginning to be used in large scale surveys across healthcare organisations.
AIM: To review quantitative studies of safety climate in health care to examine the psychometric properties of the questionnaires designed to measure this construct. METHOD: A systematic literature review was undertaken to study sample and questionnaire design characteristics (source, no of items, scale type), construct validity (content validity, factor structure and internal reliability, concurrent validity), within group agreement, and level of analysis. RESULTS: Twelve studies were examined. There was a lack of explicit theoretical underpinning for most questionnaires and some instruments did not report standard psychometric criteria. Where this information was available, several questionnaires appeared to have limitations. CONCLUSIONS: More consideration should be given to psychometric factors in the design of healthcare safety climate instruments, especially as these are beginning to be used in large scale surveys across healthcare organisations.
Authors: R R Gershon; C D Karkashian; J W Grosch; L R Murphy; A Escamilla-Cejudo; P A Flanagan; E Bernacki; C Kasting; L Martin Journal: Am J Infect Control Date: 2000-06 Impact factor: 2.918
Authors: R R Gershon; D Vlahov; S A Felknor; D Vesley; P C Johnson; G L Delclos; L R Murphy Journal: Am J Infect Control Date: 1995-08 Impact factor: 2.918
Authors: Liane R Ginsburg; You-Ta Chuang; Whitney Blair Berta; Peter G Norton; Peggy Ng; Deborah Tregunno; Julia Richardson Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2010-03-10 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Liane Ginsburg; Debra Gilin; Deborah Tregunno; Peter G Norton; Ward Flemons; Mark Fleming Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2008-09-17 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Sara J Singer; Christine W Hartmann; Amresh Hanchate; Shibei Zhao; Mark Meterko; Priti Shokeen; Shoutzu Lin; David M Gaba; Amy K Rosen Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2009-07-03 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Sunni A Barnes; Jan Compton; Margaret Saldaña; Kristen M Tecson; Chizuko Hastings; Donald A Kennerly Journal: Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) Date: 2016-10
Authors: Andreas Valentin; Michael Schiffinger; Johannes Steyrer; Clemens Huber; Guido Strunk Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2012-12-07 Impact factor: 17.440