Literature DB >> 16584702

The impact of secondary task cognitive processing demand on driving performance.

Myra Blanco1, Wayne J Biever, John P Gallagher, Thomas A Dingus.   

Abstract

Crash causation research has identified inattention as a major source of driver error leading to crashes. The series of experiments presented herein investigate the characteristics of an in-vehicle information system (IVIS) task that could hinder driving performance due to uncertainty buildup and cognitive capture. Three on-road studies were performed that used instrumented passenger and tractor-trailer vehicles to obtain real-world driving performance data. Participants included young, middle-aged, and older passenger vehicle drivers and middle-aged and older commercial vehicle operators. While driving, they were presented with IVIS tasks with various information densities, decision-making elements, presentation formats, and presentation modalities (visual or auditory). The experiments showed that, for both presentation modalities, the presence of multiple decision-making elements in a task had a substantial negative impact on driving performance of both automobile drivers and truck drivers when compared to conventional tasks or tasks with only one decision-making element. The results from these experiments can be used to improve IVIS designs, allowing for potential IVIS task phenomena such as uncertainty buildup and cognitive capture to be avoided.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16584702     DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2006.02.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Accid Anal Prev        ISSN: 0001-4575


  6 in total

Review 1.  Associations between driving performance and engaging in secondary tasks: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alva O Ferdinand; Nir Menachemi
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Reduced motor cortex inhibition and a 'cognitive-first' prioritisation strategy for older adults during dual-tasking.

Authors:  Daniel T Corp; George J Youssef; Ross A Clark; Joyce Gomes-Osman; Meryem A Yücel; Stuart J Oldham; Shatha Aldraiwiesh; Jordyn Rice; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Mark A Rogers
Journal:  Exp Gerontol       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 4.032

3.  Modified Navigation Instructions for Spatial Navigation Assistance Systems Lead to Incidental Spatial Learning.

Authors:  Klaus Gramann; Paul Hoepner; Katja Karrer-Gauss
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-02-13

4.  Dual-Task Interference in a Simulated Driving Environment: Serial or Parallel Processing?

Authors:  Mojtaba Abbas-Zadeh; Gholam-Ali Hossein-Zadeh; Maryam Vaziri-Pashkam
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-01-12

5.  Multi-modal assessment of on-road demand of voice and manual phone calling and voice navigation entry across two embedded vehicle systems.

Authors:  Bruce Mehler; David Kidd; Bryan Reimer; Ian Reagan; Jonathan Dobres; Anne McCartt
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  How to Interact with a Fully Autonomous Vehicle: Naturalistic Ways for Drivers to Intervene in the Vehicle System While Performing Non-Driving Related Tasks.

Authors:  Aya Ataya; Won Kim; Ahmed Elsharkawy; SeungJun Kim
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-21       Impact factor: 3.576

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.