OBJECTIVE: To determine prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in patients with diabetes, and accuracy of International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes to identify such patients. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: Secondary data from 1999 to 2000. We linked all inpatient and outpatient administrative and clinical records of U.S. veterans with diabetes dually enrolled in Medicare and the Veterans Administration (VA) health care systems. STUDY DESIGN: We used a cross-sectional, observational design to determine the sensitivity and specificity of renal-related ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes in identifying individuals with chronic kidney disease. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: We estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) from serum creatinine and defined CKD as Stage 3, 4, or 5 CKD by eGFR criterion according to the Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative guidelines. Renal-related ICD-9-CM codes were grouped by algorithm. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Prevalence of CKD was 31.6 percent in the veteran sample with diabetes. Depending on the detail of the algorithm, only 20.2 to 42.4 percent of individuals with CKD received a renal-related diagnosis code in either VA or Medicare records over 1 year. Specificity of renal codes for CKD ranged from 93.2 to 99.4 percent. Patients hospitalized in VA facilities were slightly more likely to be correctly coded for CKD than patients hospitalized in facilities reimbursed by Medicare (OR 5.4 versus 4.1, p=.0330) CONCLUSIONS: CKD is a common comorbidity for patients with diabetes in the VA system. Diagnosis codes in administrative records from Medicare and VA systems are insensitive, but specific markers for patients with CKD.
OBJECTIVE: To determine prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in patients with diabetes, and accuracy of International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes to identify such patients. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: Secondary data from 1999 to 2000. We linked all inpatient and outpatient administrative and clinical records of U.S. veterans with diabetes dually enrolled in Medicare and the Veterans Administration (VA) health care systems. STUDY DESIGN: We used a cross-sectional, observational design to determine the sensitivity and specificity of renal-related ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes in identifying individuals with chronic kidney disease. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: We estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) from serum creatinine and defined CKD as Stage 3, 4, or 5 CKD by eGFR criterion according to the Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative guidelines. Renal-related ICD-9-CM codes were grouped by algorithm. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Prevalence of CKD was 31.6 percent in the veteran sample with diabetes. Depending on the detail of the algorithm, only 20.2 to 42.4 percent of individuals with CKD received a renal-related diagnosis code in either VA or Medicare records over 1 year. Specificity of renal codes for CKD ranged from 93.2 to 99.4 percent. Patients hospitalized in VA facilities were slightly more likely to be correctly coded for CKD than patients hospitalized in facilities reimbursed by Medicare (OR 5.4 versus 4.1, p=.0330) CONCLUSIONS: CKD is a common comorbidity for patients with diabetes in the VA system. Diagnosis codes in administrative records from Medicare and VA systems are insensitive, but specific markers for patients with CKD.
Authors: E J Lewis; L G Hunsicker; W R Clarke; T Berl; M A Pohl; J B Lewis; E Ritz; R C Atkins; R Rohde; I Raz Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2001-09-20 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: B M Brenner; M E Cooper; D de Zeeuw; W F Keane; W E Mitch; H H Parving; G Remuzzi; S M Snapinn; Z Zhang; S Shahinfar Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2001-09-20 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: L A Szczech; P J Best; E Crowley; M M Brooks; P B Berger; V Bittner; B J Gersh; R Jones; R M Califf; H H Ting; P J Whitlow; K M Detre; D Holmes Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-05-14 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: L Gruberg; R Mehran; G Dangas; G S Mintz; R Waksman; K M Kent; A D Pichard; L F Satler; H Wu; M B Leon Journal: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2001-04 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: R Scott Wright; Guy S Reeder; Charles A Herzog; Robert C Albright; Brent A Williams; David L Dvorak; Wayne L Miller; Joseph G Murphy; Stephen L Kopecky; Allan S Jaffe Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2002-10-01 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Michael G Shlipak; Paul A Heidenreich; Haruko Noguchi; Glenn M Chertow; Warren S Browner; Mark B McClellan Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2002-10-01 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Morgan E Grams; Laura C Plantinga; Elizabeth Hedgeman; Rajiv Saran; Gary L Myers; Desmond E Williams; Neil R Powe Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2010-08-06 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Wei-Qi Wei; Pedro L Teixeira; Huan Mo; Robert M Cronin; Jeremy L Warner; Joshua C Denny Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2015-09-02 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Truls Ostbye; Donald H Taylor; Elizabeth C Clipp; Lynn Van Scoyoc; Brenda L Plassman Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2008-02 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Patricia St Clair; Étienne Gaudette; Henu Zhao; Bryan Tysinger; Roxanna Seyedin; Dana P Goldman Journal: Med Care Date: 2017-08 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Nada El Husseini; Gregg C Fonarow; Eric E Smith; Christine Ju; Shubin Sheng; Lee H Schwamm; Adrian F Hernandez; Phillip J Schulte; Ying Xian; Larry B Goldstein Journal: Stroke Date: 2018-12 Impact factor: 7.914