Literature DB >> 16583922

Acoustic detection and classification of Microchiroptera using machine learning: lessons learned from automatic speech recognition.

Mark D Skowronski1, John G Harris.   

Abstract

Current automatic acoustic detection and classification of microchiroptera utilize global features of individual calls (i.e., duration, bandwidth, frequency extrema), an approach that stems from expert knowledge of call sonograms. This approach parallels the acoustic phonetic paradigm of human automatic speech recognition (ASR), which relied on expert knowledge to account for variations in canonical linguistic units. ASR research eventually shifted from acoustic phonetics to machine learning, primarily because of the superior ability of machine learning to account for signal variation. To compare machine learning with conventional methods of detection and classification, nearly 3000 search-phase calls were hand labeled from recordings of five species: Pipistrellus bodenheimeri, Molossus molossus, Lasiurus borealis, L. cinereus semotus, and Tadarida brasiliensis. The hand labels were used to train two machine learning models: a Gaussian mixture model (GMM) for detection and classification and a hidden Markov model (HMM) for classification. The GMM detector produced 4% error compared to 32% error for a baseline broadband energy detector, while the GMM and HMM classifiers produced errors of 0.6 +/- 0.2% compared to 16.9 +/- 1.1% error for a baseline discriminant function analysis classifier. The experiments showed that machine learning algorithms produced errors an order of magnitude smaller than those for conventional methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16583922     DOI: 10.1121/1.2166948

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  4 in total

1.  Long recording sequences: how to track the intra-individual variability of acoustic signals.

Authors:  Thierry Lengagne; Doris Gomez; Rémy Josserand; Yann Voituron
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  A new method for ecoacoustics? Toward the extraction and evaluation of ecologically-meaningful soundscape components using sparse coding methods.

Authors:  Alice Eldridge; Michael Casey; Paola Moscoso; Mika Peck
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Bat detective-Deep learning tools for bat acoustic signal detection.

Authors:  Oisin Mac Aodha; Rory Gibb; Kate E Barlow; Ella Browning; Michael Firman; Robin Freeman; Briana Harder; Libby Kinsey; Gary R Mead; Stuart E Newson; Ivan Pandourski; Stuart Parsons; Jon Russ; Abigel Szodoray-Paradi; Farkas Szodoray-Paradi; Elena Tilova; Mark Girolami; Gabriel Brostow; Kate E Jones
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 4.475

4.  Automatic classification of a taxon-rich community recorded in the wild.

Authors:  Ilyas Potamitis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.