Literature DB >> 16583720

Stroke recurrence and its prevention in patients with patent foramen ovale.

J U Harrer1, T Wessels, A Franke, S Lucas, P Berlit, C Klötzsch.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether medical or invasive (surgical or catheter interventional) treatment is preferable to prevent recurrence of cerebral ischemia in patients with patent foramen ovale (PFO) as the suspected cause of stroke and what the role of concomitant risk factors is in stroke recurrence.
METHODS: Over a period of ten years, 124 patients (mean age 51 +/- 15 years) with cryptogenic cerebral ischemia and PFO were included into the study and prospectively followed over a mean of 52 +/- 32 months. Of these, 83 were treated medically, 34 underwent transcatheter closure, and seven had surgical closure of the foramen. Of the medically treated patients, 11 stopped medication during follow-up. Recurrent ischemic events and risk factors for recurrence were analyzed.
RESULTS: Annual stroke recurrence rates were generally low and comparable in catheter and medically treated patients, and in patients who had stopped medication (2.9%/2.1%2.2%/year). Patients suffering from recurrence after transcatheter closure (n = 2) both had residual shunts. No stroke recurrence was observed in the few surgically treated patients. An atrial septal aneurysm was not a predictor of recurrent or multiple strokes (p > 0.05, OR = 0.31, and OR = 0.74). Large shunts and a history of previous ischemic events were considerably more frequent in patients with recurrent strokes (p < 0.05, OR = 5.0, and OR = 4.4). Pulmonary embolism and case fatality rates were significantly higher in patients with stroke recurrence (p < 0.001, and p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: The absolute risk of recurrent cerebrovascular events in patients with PFO receiving medical or catheter interventional therapy is low. The small group of untreated patients had a comparably low rate of stroke recurrences. Previous ischemic events and shunt size were risk factors in this observational study. Given conflicting findings across multiple studies, enrollment into a randomized controlled trial would be the optimal choice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16583720     DOI: 10.1017/s0317167100004674

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Neurol Sci        ISSN: 0317-1671            Impact factor:   2.104


  10 in total

Review 1.  Patent foramen ovale closure and medical treatments for secondary stroke prevention: a systematic review of observational and randomized evidence.

Authors:  Georgios D Kitsios; Issa J Dahabreh; Abd Moain Abu Dabrh; David E Thaler; David M Kent
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 7.914

2.  PFO Closure for Cryptogenic Stroke: Review of New Data and Results.

Authors:  Shyam Rao; Cathy Sila
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2013-06

3.  Patent foramen ovale closure for patients with cryptogenic stroke: A systematic review and comprehensive meta-analysis of 5 randomized controlled trials and 14 observational studies.

Authors:  Xi Chen; Shi-Dong Chen; Yi Dong; Qiang Dong
Journal:  CNS Neurosci Ther       Date:  2018-05-27       Impact factor: 5.243

Review 4.  PFO Closure for Cryptogenic Stroke.

Authors:  Sabreena J Gillow; Vivien H Lee
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 5.  Anticoagulant vs. antiplatelet therapy in patients with cryptogenic stroke and patent foramen ovale: an individual participant data meta-analysis.

Authors:  David M Kent; Issa J Dahabreh; Robin Ruthazer; Anthony J Furlan; Christian Weimar; Joaquín Serena; Bernhard Meier; Heinrich P Mattle; Emanuele Di Angelantonio; Maurizio Paciaroni; Herwig Schuchlenz; Shunichi Homma; Jennifer S Lutz; David E Thaler
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 29.983

6.  Decrease in shunt volume in patients with cryptogenic stroke and patent foramen ovale.

Authors:  Christian Tanislav; Manfred Kaps; Marek Jauss; Erwin Stolz; Wolfgang Pabst; Max Nedelmann; Mathias Grebe; Frank Reichenberger; Jens Allendoerfer
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2010-12-29       Impact factor: 2.474

7.  Percutaneous closure versus medical therapy for stroke with patent foramen Ovale: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xin-Lin Zhang; Li-Na Kang; Lian Wang; Biao Xu
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 2.298

8.  Real-world evidence in health technology assessment of high-risk medical devices: Fit for purpose?

Authors:  Philip Klein; Hedwig Blommestein; Maiwenn Al; Benedetta Pongiglione; Aleksandra Torbica; Saskia de Groot
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2022-08-21       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 9.  Multidisciplinary management of patent foramen ovale (PFO) and cryptogenic stroke/TIA.

Authors:  Naqibullah Mirzada; Per Ladenvall; Per-Olof Hansson; Peter Eriksson; Mikael Dellborg
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2013-09-16

10.  Seven-year follow-up of percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale.

Authors:  Naqibullah Mirzada; Per Ladenvall; Per-Olof Hansson; Magnus Carl Johansson; Eva Furenäs; Peter Eriksson; Mikael Dellborg
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vessel       Date:  2013-11-14
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.