Literature DB >> 16583364

Motivation and synthesis of the FIAC experiment: Reproducibility of fMRI results across expert analyses.

Jean-Baptiste Poline1, Stephen C Strother, Ghislaine Dehaene-Lambertz, Gary F Egan, Jack L Lancaster.   

Abstract

The Functional Imaging Analysis Contest (FIAC) culminated in the FIAC Workshop held at the 11th Annual Meeting of the Organization for Human Brain Mapping in Toronto in 2005. This special issue summarizes various analyses used by contestants with a single functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study, a cortical-language study using sentence repetition. The results from the cognitive neuroscientists who developed the test-base language study, and report their data analysis, are complemented by expert analyses of the same test-base data by most of the major groups actively developing fMRI software packages. Analyses include many variants of the general linear model (GLM), cutting-edge spatial- and temporal-wavelets, permutation-based, and ICA approaches. A number of authors also include surface-based approaches. Several articles describe the important emerging areas of diagnostics for GLM analysis, multivariate predictive modeling, and functional connectivity analysis. While the FIAC did not achieve all of its goals, it helped identify new activation regions in the test-base data, and more important, through this special issue it illustrates the significant methods-driven variability that potentially exists in the literature. Variable results from different methods reported here should provide a cautionary note and motivate the Human Brain Mapping community to explore more thoroughly the methodologies they use for analyzing fMRI data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16583364      PMCID: PMC6871293          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.20268

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  19 in total

1.  Dissociated responses in the amygdala and orbitofrontal cortex to bottom-up and top-down components of emotional evaluation.

Authors:  Paul Wright; Dolores Albarracin; Rick D Brown; Hong Li; Guojun He; Yijun Liu
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-09-19       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Evaluation and comparison of GLM- and CVA-based fMRI processing pipelines with Java-based fMRI processing pipeline evaluation system.

Authors:  Jing Zhang; Lichen Liang; Jon R Anderson; Lael Gatewood; David A Rottenberg; Stephen C Strother
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-04-03       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Thresholding lesion overlap difference maps: application to category-related naming and recognition deficits.

Authors:  David Rudrauf; Sonya Mehta; Joel Bruss; Daniel Tranel; Hanna Damasio; Thomas J Grabowski
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-12-27       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Outsourcing neuroimaging data analysis Implications for scientific accountability and issues in the public interest.

Authors:  Anthony Steven Dick; Uri Hasson
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2009-10-19       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  Optimizing preprocessing and analysis pipelines for single-subject fMRI. I. Standard temporal motion and physiological noise correction methods.

Authors:  Nathan W Churchill; Anita Oder; Hervé Abdi; Fred Tam; Wayne Lee; Christopher Thomas; Jon E Ween; Simon J Graham; Stephen C Strother
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Common component classification: what can we learn from machine learning?

Authors:  Ariana Anderson; Jennifer S Labus; Eduardo P Vianna; Emeran A Mayer; Mark S Cohen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 7.  Neuroimaging of the periaqueductal gray: state of the field.

Authors:  Clas Linnman; Eric A Moulton; Gabi Barmettler; Lino Becerra; David Borsook
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Repeatability of language fMRI lateralization and localization metrics in brain tumor patients.

Authors:  Shruti Agarwal; Jun Hua; Haris I Sair; Sachin Gujar; Chetan Bettegowda; Hanzhang Lu; Jay J Pillai
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-08-04       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Dynamic causal modelling for EEG and MEG.

Authors:  Stefan J Kiebel; Marta I Garrido; Rosalyn J Moran; Karl J Friston
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2008-04-23       Impact factor: 5.082

Review 10.  Uses of Human MR and PET Imaging in Research of Neurodegenerative Brain Diseases.

Authors:  Christopher G Schwarz
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 7.620

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.