Literature DB >> 16582112

Outcome after transabdominal cervicoisthmic cerclage.

Frederik K Lotgering1, Ingrid P M Gaugler-Senden, Sabine F Lotgering, Henk C S Wallenburg.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate benefits and risks of transabdominal cervicoisthmic cerclage in women with cervical insufficiency in whom transvaginal cerclage is considered surgically unfeasible.
METHODS: This was an observational cohort study with historical controls of 101 pregnancies after transabdominal cervicoisthmic cerclage in 101 women with a classic history of cervical insufficiency and severe cervical defects precluding transvaginal cerclage.
RESULTS: Median gestational age at elective transabdominal cerclage (n = 95) was 14 (range 12-16) weeks and at emergency cerclage (n = 6) was 18 (range 17-22) weeks. Perioperative complications were blood loss 500 mL or more (n = 3) and rupture of membranes (n = 2). Patients were delivered by cesarean. Before cerclage 76% (95% confidence interval [CI] 70.2-81.1%) of births occurred before 32 weeks of gestation; total neonatal survival was 27.5% (95% CI 22.5-33.8%). After transabdominal cervicoisthmic cerclage 7% (95% CI 2.9-13.9%) of births took place before 32 weeks of gestation, and total neonatal survival was 93.5% (95% CI 85.5-96.6%).
CONCLUSION: In women with a classic history of cervical insufficiency and a traumatized cervix that precludes transvaginal cerclage, transabdominal cervicoisthmic cerclage is associated with successful outcome in the absence of procedure-related major complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-2.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16582112     DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000206817.97328.cd

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  7 in total

1.  Laparoscopic placement of cervical cerclage.

Authors:  Olga A Tusheva; Sarah L Cohen; Thomas F McElrath; Jon I Einarsson
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012

2.  Minimally invasive abdominal cerclage compared to laparotomy: a comparison of surgical and obstetric outcomes.

Authors:  Soorin Kim; Amanda Hill; Gulden Menderes; Sarah Cross; Masoud Azodi; Mert Ozan Bahtiyar
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-07-18

3.  Evaluation of Maternal-Fetal Outcomes After Emergency Vaginal Cerclage Performed With Shirodkar-McDonald Combined Modified Technique.

Authors:  Leonarda Ciancimino; Antonio Simone Laganà; Giovanna Imbesi; Benito Chiofalo; Alfredo Mancuso; Onofrio Triolo
Journal:  J Clin Med Res       Date:  2015-03-01

4.  Prediction of outcome for transabdominal cerclage in women with cervical insufficiency.

Authors:  Ji Eun Song; Keun Young Lee; Ga Hyun Son
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 5.  Clinical aspects of cervical insufficiency.

Authors:  Frederik K Lotgering
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2007-06-01       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Abdominal cerclage in twin pregnancy after radical surgical conization.

Authors:  Ioannis Kyvernitakis; Fred Lotgering; Birgit Arabin
Journal:  Case Rep Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-01-28

7.  Controversies about the Secondary Prevention of Spontaneous Preterm Birth.

Authors:  Ioannis Kyvernitakis; Holger Maul; Franz Bahlmann
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 2.915

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.