Literature DB >> 16581729

Evaluating novel interventions for chlamydia screening.

N Low.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2006        PMID： 16581729      PMCID： PMC2564701          DOI： 10.1136/sti.2005.017889

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sex Transm Infect        ISSN： 1368-4973            Impact factor:   3.519


× No keyword cloud information.
  11 in total

1.  Acceptability and feasibility of urine screening for Chlamydia and gonorrhea in community organizations: perspectives from Denver and St Louis.

Authors:  S S Bull; C A Jones; D Granberry-Owens; B P Stoner; C A Rietmeijer
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  What should we do about screening for genital chlamydia?

Authors:  Nicola Low; Matthias Egger
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 7.196

Review 3.  New concepts in screening.

Authors:  J A Muir Gray
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Screening for chlamydial infection: are we doing enough?

Authors:  William C Miller
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 Feb 5-11       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 5.  Screening for genital chlamydial infection.

Authors:  J M Stephenson
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.291

6.  A prediction rule for selective screening of Chlamydia trachomatis infection.

Authors:  H M Götz; J E A M van Bergen; I K Veldhuijzen; J Broer; C J P A Hoebe; E W Steyerberg; A J J Coenen; F de Groot; M J C Verhooren; D T van Schaik; J H Richardus
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.519

7.  Prevalence of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis increases significantly with level of urbanisation and suggests targeted screening approaches: results from the first national population based study in the Netherlands.

Authors:  J van Bergen; H M Götz; J H Richardus; C J P A Hoebe; J Broer; A J T Coenen
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.519

8.  Feasibility and yield of screening urine for Chlamydia trachomatis by polymerase chain reaction among high-risk male youth in field-based and other nonclinic settings. A new strategy for sexually transmitted disease control.

Authors:  C A Rietmeijer; K J Yamaguchi; C G Ortiz; S A Montstream; T LeRoux; J M Ehret; F N Judson; J M Douglas
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 2.830

9.  Establishing the National Chlamydia Screening Programme in England: results from the first full year of screening.

Authors:  D S LaMontagne; K A Fenton; S Randall; S Anderson; P Carter
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.519

10.  Prevention of pelvic inflammatory disease by screening for cervical chlamydial infection.

Authors:  D Scholes; A Stergachis; F E Heidrich; H Andrilla; K K Holmes; W E Stamm
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-05-23       Impact factor: 91.245
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Interventions for increasing chlamydia screening in primary care: a review.

Authors:  Samitha Ginige; Christopher K Fairley; Jane S Hocking; Francis J Bowden; Marcus Y Chen
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2007-06-04       Impact factor: 3.295
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.