Literature DB >> 16581640

Interprofessional collaboration with service users in the development of cancer services: the Cancer Partnership Project.

John Sitzia1, Phil Cotterell, Alison Richardson.   

Abstract

Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) is a cornerstone of UK National Health Service (NHS) policy. The Cancer Partnership Project (CPP) is the leading national PPI initiative in cancer care. The CPP espouses a "partnership" model, with a "Partnership Group" - collaborative service improvement groups formed of NHS staff and service users - in each of 34 cancer networks in England. These groups aim to enable service users to influence local cancer service development and thereby improve the effectiveness of services. We interviewed 59 cancer service users and NHS staff in a reflective evaluation of CPP. Groups were active and visible in 30 networks, their main activities being: providing an accessible source of consumer opinion; prolific networking and representation; patient information and communication projects; and lobbying for service improvements. The groups exhibited some significant tensions. The motivations of professional staff varied markedly, and "obligatory" involvement as part of a person's job was counter-productive when not coupled with a "personal" belief in the value of PPI. Other controversial areas were the disclosure by patients' of personal health and treatment experiences, and emotional attachment to the group. It was concluded that partnership groups represent a useful PPI model, but more attention generally should be paid to the complexities of PPI and timescales required for meaningful cultural change.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16581640     DOI: 10.1080/13561820500515304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interprof Care        ISSN: 1356-1820            Impact factor:   2.338


  6 in total

1.  Exploring the influence of service user involvement on health and social care services for cancer.

Authors:  Pamela Attree; Sara Morris; Sheila Payne; Suzanne Vaughan; Susan Hinder
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  'Calling executives and clinicians to account': user involvement in commissioning cancer services.

Authors:  David H Evans; Roger J Bacon; Elizabeth Greer; Angela M Stagg; Pat Turton
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  The role of community representatives on health service committees: staff expectations vs. reality.

Authors:  Sally Nathan; Lynda Johnston; Jeffrey Braithwaite
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Weak and strong publics: drawing on Nancy Fraser to explore parental participation in neonatal networks.

Authors:  Andrew J Gibson; Gillian Lewando-Hundt; Loraine Blaxter
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  Facilitating the action of community representatives in a health service: the role of a community participation coordinator.

Authors:  Sally Nathan; Jeffrey Braithwaite; Niamh Stephenson
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-04-29       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 6.  Patient and carer involvement in palliative care research: An integrative qualitative evidence synthesis review.

Authors:  Eleni Chambers; Clare Gardiner; Jill Thompson; Jane Seymour
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2019-06-28       Impact factor: 4.762

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.