Literature DB >> 16581162

'Combined vaccines are like a sudden onslaught to the body's immune system': parental concerns about vaccine 'overload' and 'immune-vulnerability'.

Shona Hilton1, Mark Petticrew, Kate Hunt.   

Abstract

The recent controversy surrounding the safety of the measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine (MMR) has heightened parents' concerns about the safety of vaccines, and led some to believe that giving vaccines in a combined form may 'overload' children's immune systems. However, to date no studies have been published examining how British parents conceptualise the notion of 'immune-overload' or how they relate this concept to their own children. Eighteen focus groups were conducted with parents between November 2002 and March 2003. The literature on vaccine decision-making suggests that parents base their immunisation decisions on two key risks: those posed by the diseases, and those associated with the vaccines aimed at preventing those diseases. Our study suggested that for some parents a third factor plays an important role, namely their assessment of the ability of their child's immune system to 'cope' with the challenge of combined vaccines, or to fight the disease. We conclude that although there is no scientific evidence that supports parents' fears about combined vaccines causing 'immune-overload', policy makers need to recognise these concerns if they are to successfully persuade parents that combined vaccines are safe.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16581162     DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.03.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  38 in total

1.  Vaccination safety update.

Authors:  Burkhard Schneeweiss; Michael Pfleiderer; Brigitte Keller-Stanislawski
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2008-08-25       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  Vaccine refusal and the endgame: walking the last mile first.

Authors:  Diane S Saint-Victor; Saad B Omer
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Promoting influenza vaccination: insights from a qualitative meta-analysis of 14 years of influenza-related communications research by U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

Authors:  Glen J Nowak; Kristine Sheedy; Kelli Bursey; Teresa M Smith; Michelle Basket
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 3.641

4.  Lack of broad functional differences in immunity in fully vaccinated vs. unvaccinated children.

Authors:  Ashley M Sherrid; Candice E Ruck; Darren Sutherland; Bing Cai; Tobias R Kollmann
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2016-12-26       Impact factor: 3.756

5.  Can mobile technologies improve on-time vaccination? A study piloting maternal use of ImmunizeCA, a Pan-Canadian immunization app.

Authors:  Katherine M Atkinson; Jacqueline Westeinde; Robin Ducharme; Sarah E Wilson; Shelley L Deeks; Natasha Crowcroft; Steven Hawken; Kumanan Wilson
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  MMR: marginalised, misrepresented and rejected? Autism: a focus group study.

Authors:  Shona Hilton; Kate Hunt; Mark Petticrew
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.791

7.  Training Students to Address Vaccine Hesitancy and/or Refusal.

Authors:  Deepti Vyas; Suzanne M Galal; Edward L Rogan; Eric G Boyce
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.047

8.  Factors associated with poor adherence to MMR vaccination in parents who follow vaccination schedule.

Authors:  Vincenzo Restivo; Giuseppe Napoli; Maria Grazia Laura Marsala; Valentina Bonanno; Valentina Sciuto; Emanuele Amodio; Giuseppe Calamusa; Francesco Vitale; Alberto Firenze
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 9.  A systematic review of decision support needs of parents making child health decisions.

Authors:  Cath Jackson; Francine M Cheater; Innes Reid
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.377

10.  Public views of the UK media and government reaction to the 2009 swine flu pandemic.

Authors:  Shona Hilton; Emily Smith
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.