Literature DB >> 16580846

Temporal pattern of source activities evoked by different types of motion onset stimuli.

Chantal Delon-Martin1, René Gobbelé, Helmut Buchner, Bernhard A Haug, Andrea Antal, Felix Darvas, Walter Paulus.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the time course of motion-related source activities evoked by the onset of different kinds of visual motion stimuli in human subjects. Event-related potentials (ERP) were recorded from 64 scalp electrodes in ten healthy subjects while they were viewing four different types of motion stimuli (translation, rotation, expansion and contraction). Following a new approach combining a current density reconstruction with clustering algorithms, source maxima in the time range from 50 to 400 ms after the onset of the visual stimulus were localized and the time courses of activation were elaborated. Six regions contributed significantly to source activity, half originating in the occipital lobe and half in the right parietal and right temporal cortex. The comparison of their time courses led to the following conclusions: (i) the different kinds of motion stimuli activated about the same areas of the brain but with different temporal patterns. (ii) Mainly parietal and extrastriate areas, but not V1/V2, were significantly involved in the differentiation of different kinds of motion. (iii) Contrasting the different kinds of motion onsets, responses from parietal areas were found mainly before those from lateral occipital areas. (iv) The classically defined N2 and P2 components were significantly different among the four motion conditions, but not P1. The N2 motion-related component was elicited not only by lateral occipital areas and middle temporal areas but also by right parietal areas. (v) The rotation condition evoked a novel component P180, concomitant with an increased activity in the left middle temporal gyrus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16580846     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.02.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  8 in total

1.  An intracranial event-related potential study on transformational apparent motion. Does its neural processing differ from real motion?

Authors:  Josie-Anne Bertrand; Maryse Lassonde; Manon Robert; Dang Khoa Nguyen; Armando Bertone; Marie-Ève Doucet; Alain Bouthillier; Franco Lepore
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  A primer on motion visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  Sven P Heinrich
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Visual information processing in recently abstaining methamphetamine-dependent individuals: evoked potentials study.

Authors:  Jan Kremlácek; Ladislav Hosák; Miroslav Kuba; Jan Libiger; Jirí Cízek
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-06-19       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Steady-state motion visual evoked potentials produced by oscillating Newton's rings: implications for brain-computer interfaces.

Authors:  Jun Xie; Guanghua Xu; Jing Wang; Feng Zhang; Yizhuo Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Steady-State Motion Visual Evoked Potential (SSMVEP) Based on Equal Luminance Colored Enhancement.

Authors:  Wenqiang Yan; Guanghua Xu; Min Li; Jun Xie; Chengcheng Han; Sicong Zhang; Ailing Luo; Chaoyang Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Brain response to luminance-based and motion-based stimulation using inter-modulation frequencies.

Authors:  Xin Zhang; Guanghua Xu; Jun Xie; Xun Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Age-related differences in the transient and steady state responses to different visual stimuli.

Authors:  Xin Zhang; Yi Jiang; Wensheng Hou; Ning Jiang
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 5.702

8.  Different EEG brain activity in right and left handers during visually induced self-motion perception.

Authors:  Michaela McAssey; James Dowsett; Valerie Kirsch; Thomas Brandt; Marianne Dieterich
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 4.849

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.