Literature DB >> 16580575

A factorial study of combination hypertension treatment with metoprolol succinate extended release and felodipine extended release results of the Metoprolol Succinate-Felodipine Antihypertension Combination Trial (M-FACT).

William H Frishman1, James W Hainer, Jennifer Sugg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many hypertensive patients require combination therapy to achieve target blood pressure (BP). beta-Blockers and dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers are effective as monotherapy in hypertensive patients and have complementary mechanisms for lowering BP.
METHODS: This multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, unbalanced factorial study included a 4- to 5-week single-blind placebo, 9-week, double-blind treatment as well as a 2-week double-blind, down-titration period. Patients (N = 1092) were randomized to one of 16 treatment groups: extended-release (ER) metoprolol succinate (25, 100, or 400 mg), ER felodipine (2.5, 10, or 20 mg), ER felodipine/ER metoprolol succinate (2.5/25, 2.5/100, 2.5/400, 10/25, 10/100, 10/400, 20/25, 20/100, or 20/400 mg), or placebo.
RESULTS: At baseline, treatment groups were well balanced; mean sitting BP was 152.6/99.9 mm Hg. Monotherapy with ER metoprolol succinate induced dose-related reductions in sitting systolic/diastolic BP (DBP) (mean 8.1/7.7 to 9.7/11.1 mm Hg) as did ER felodipine (mean 7.7/7.7 to 14.0/11.8) and the combinations reflected additive effects (mean 13.8/11.0 to 19.8/15.2). The decline in the placebo group was 2.1/4.0 mm Hg. All combinations were more effective than their components (P < .05 for all but ER metoprolol succinate 25/ER felodipine 20). When compared with the highest doses of the individual agents (ER metoprolol succinate 400 mg; ER felodipine 20 mg), the low-dose combination ER metoprolol succinate 25/ER felodipine 2.5 was approximately as effective (differences in DBP <1 mm Hg). The most common adverse events leading to discontinuation were peripheral edema (4%), headache (2%), and fatigue (1%). Higher rates of peripheral edema and flushing were associated with high-dose ER felodipine, either alone or in combination.
CONCLUSIONS: The antihypertensive effects of ER metoprolol succinate and ER felodipine are dose-related, and when given in combination, their BP-lowering effects are additive over a wide dose range. Low-dose combination therapy is comparable in effectiveness to high-dose monotherapy but is better tolerated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16580575     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2005.10.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hypertens        ISSN: 0895-7061            Impact factor:   2.689


  10 in total

1.  Development of a sustained-release microcapsule for delivery of metoprolol succinate.

Authors:  Li Song; Shengjiang He; Qineng Ping
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 2.  More medications, fewer pills: combination medications for the treatment of hypertension.

Authors:  Richard Lewanczuk; Sheldon W Tobe
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 5.223

3.  Combination therapy in hypertension.

Authors:  Alan H Gradman; Jan N Basile; Barry L Carter; George L Bakris
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2010-12-10       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 4.  Blood pressure lowering efficacy of beta-1 selective beta blockers for primary hypertension.

Authors:  Gavin W K Wong; Heidi N Boyda; James M Wright
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-03-10

5.  Current perspectives on combination therapy in the management of hypertension.

Authors:  Samir G Mallat; Houssam S Itani; Bassem Y Tanios
Journal:  Integr Blood Press Control       Date:  2013-06-17

6.  A randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter phase II trial of Allisartan Isoproxil in essential hypertensive population at low-medium risk.

Authors:  Ying Li; Xiao-hui Li; Zhi-jun Huang; Guo-ping Yang; Guo-gang Zhang; Shui-ping Zhao; Ying Guo; Shi-juan Lu; Jian-lin Ma; Fan-bo Meng; Ping Chen; Hong Yuan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  I brazilian position paper on antihypertensive drug combination.

Authors:  Rui Póvoa; Weimar Sebba Barroso; Andrea A Brandão; Paulo Cesar Veiga Jardim; Oswaldo Barroso; Oswaldo Passarelli; João Roberto Gemelli; Audes Feitosa; Thiago Veiga Jardim; Sergio Baiocchi Carneiro; Celso Amodeo; Osni Moreira Filho; Armando da Rocha Nogueira; Nelson Siqueira de Morais; Luiz Cesar Nazário Scala; Carolina Gonzaga; Dilma do Socorro Moraes de Souza; Annelise Machado Gomes de Paiva; Marcus Vinicius Bolivar Malachias; Décio Mion; Marco Antônio Mota-Gomes; Eduardo Costa Duarte Barbosa; Marcio Gonçalves de Sousa; Henrique Tria Bianco; Francisco Antonio Helfenstein Fonseca; Marcio Kalil; Roberto Dischinger Miranda; Carlos André Uehara; Antônio Felipe Sanjuliani
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.000

8.  Measurements, Thermodynamic Modeling, and a Hydrogen Bonding Study on the Solubilities of Metoprolol Succinate in Organic Solvents.

Authors:  Jian Shen; Xianrui Liang; Hao Lei
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 4.411

9.  Comparative peripheral edema for dihydropyridines calcium channel blockers treatment: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ling Liang; Janice Y Kung; Bradley Mitchelmore; Andrew Cave; Hoan Linh Banh
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 2.885

Review 10.  Proactive compared with passive adverse event recognition: calcium channel blocker-associated edema.

Authors:  Steven G Chrysant
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.738

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.