PURPOSE: To compare magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings at different stages of cervix cancer treatment and to define the potential of MRI to delineate the gross tumor volume (GTV), clinical target volume (CTV), pathoanatomic structures, and organs at risk (OAR) in brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Forty-nine patients underwent MRI at diagnosis and at brachytherapy. The ability to discriminate anatomic structures on MRI was assessed (quality factor: 0 = inability to discriminate; 1 = fair discrimination; 2 = good discrimination; 3 = excellent discrimination). The overall ability to visualize (percentage of patients with quality factors greater than 0) and the overall discrimination quality score (mean quality factors of all patients) were estimated for the applicator, GTV at diagnosis (GTV(D)), GTV at brachytherapy (GTV(BT))/"gray zones," cervix rim/uterine corpus, OAR, vaginal wall, and parametria. RESULTS: The overall ability to visualize the applicator on MRI at brachytherapy was 100%; for the GTV(BT)/"gray zones," cervix rim/uterine corpus, OAR, and vaginal wall, visualization was 98% (overall discrimination quality factors: 1.2, 2.9, 2.1, 1.9, 1.7, and 2.6). Three of 4 borders of parametrial space were defined in more than 98% (discrimination quality factors: 2.9, 2.1, and 1.2). CONCLUSION: Magnetic resonance imaging provides appropriate information for definition of the applicator, GTV, CTV, pathoanatomic structures, and OAR that enables precise delineation for cervix cancer brachytherapy.
PURPOSE: To compare magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings at different stages of cervix cancer treatment and to define the potential of MRI to delineate the gross tumor volume (GTV), clinical target volume (CTV), pathoanatomic structures, and organs at risk (OAR) in brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Forty-nine patients underwent MRI at diagnosis and at brachytherapy. The ability to discriminate anatomic structures on MRI was assessed (quality factor: 0 = inability to discriminate; 1 = fair discrimination; 2 = good discrimination; 3 = excellent discrimination). The overall ability to visualize (percentage of patients with quality factors greater than 0) and the overall discrimination quality score (mean quality factors of all patients) were estimated for the applicator, GTV at diagnosis (GTV(D)), GTV at brachytherapy (GTV(BT))/"gray zones," cervix rim/uterine corpus, OAR, vaginal wall, and parametria. RESULTS: The overall ability to visualize the applicator on MRI at brachytherapy was 100%; for the GTV(BT)/"gray zones," cervix rim/uterine corpus, OAR, and vaginal wall, visualization was 98% (overall discrimination quality factors: 1.2, 2.9, 2.1, 1.9, 1.7, and 2.6). Three of 4 borders of parametrial space were defined in more than 98% (discrimination quality factors: 2.9, 2.1, and 1.2). CONCLUSION: Magnetic resonance imaging provides appropriate information for definition of the applicator, GTV, CTV, pathoanatomic structures, and OAR that enables precise delineation for cervix cancer brachytherapy.
Authors: Jay S Cooper; Suresh K Mukherji; Alicia Y Toledano; Clifford Beldon; Ilona M Schmalfuss; Robert Amdur; Scott Sailer; Laurie A Loevner; Phil Kousouboris; K Kian Ang; Jean Cormack; JoRean Sicks Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2007-01-08 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: M Dolezel; K Odrazka; J Vanasek; T Kohlova; T Kroulik; K Kudelka; D Spitzer; M Mrklovsky; M Tichy; J Zizka; L Jalcova Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: M P Schmid; R Pötter; P Brader; A Kratochwil; G Goldner; K Kirchheiner; A Sturdza; C Kirisits Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2012-12-21 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Johannes C A Dimopoulos; Gertrude Schirl; Anja Baldinger; Thomas H Helbich; Richard Pötter Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2009-05-15 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: M P Schmid; B Mansmann; M Federico; J C A Dimopoulous; P Georg; E Fidarova; W Dörr; R Pötter Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2013-01-25 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Carri K Glide-Hurst; Eric S Paulson; Kiaran McGee; Neelam Tyagi; Yanle Hu; James Balter; John Bayouth Journal: Med Phys Date: 2021-07 Impact factor: 4.071