Literature DB >> 16580440

Cost-effectiveness of routine mediastinoscopy in computed tomography- and positron emission tomography-screened patients with stage I lung cancer.

Bryan F Meyers1, Fabio Haddad, Barry A Siegel, Jennifer Bell Zoole, Richard J Battafarano, Nirmal Veeramachaneni, Joel D Cooper, G Alexander Patterson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Accurate preoperative staging is essential for the optimal management of patients with lung cancer. An important goal of preoperative staging is to identify mediastinal lymph node metastasis. Computed tomography and positron emission tomography may identify mediastinal lymph node metastasis with sufficient sensitivity to allow omission of mediastinoscopy. This study utilizes our experience with patients with clinical stage I lung cancer to perform a decision analysis addressing whether mediastinoscopy should be performed in clinical stage I lung cancer patients staged by computed tomography and positron emission tomography.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our thoracic surgery database for cases between May 1999 and May 2004. Patients deemed clinical stage I by computed tomography and positron emission tomography were chosen for further study. Individual computed tomography, positron emission tomography, and operative and pathology reports were reviewed. The postresection pathologic staging and long-term survival were recorded. A decision model was created using TreeAgePro software and our observed data for the prevalence of mediastinal lymph node metastases and for the rate of benign nodules. Data reported in the literature were also utilized to complete the decision analysis model. A sensitivity analysis of key variables was performed.
RESULTS: A total of 248 patients with clinical stage I lung tumors were identified. One hundred seventy-eight patients (72%) underwent mediastinoscopy before resection, and 5/178 (3%) showed N2 disease. An additional 9 patients were found to have N2 metastasis in the final resected specimen, resulting in a total of 14/248 patients (5.6%) with occult mediastinal lymph node metastases. Benign nodules were found in 19/248 (8%) of patients. Decision analysis determined that mediastinoscopy added 0.008 years of life expectancy at a cost of 250,989 dollars per life-year gained. The outcome was sensitive to the prevalence of N2 disease in the population and the benefit of induction versus adjuvant therapy for N2 lung cancer. If the prevalence of N2 disease exceeds 10%, the sensitivity analysis predicts that mediastinoscopy would lengthen life at a cost of less than 100,000 dollars per life-year gained.
CONCLUSION: Patients with clinical stage I lung cancer staged by computed tomography and positron emission tomography benefit little from mediastinoscopy. The survival advantage it confers is very small and is dependent on the prevalence of N2 metastasis and the unproven superiority of induction therapy over adjuvant therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16580440     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2005.10.045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  31 in total

1.  PET-CT limitations in early stage non-small cell lung cancer: to whom more aggressive approach in radiotherapy and surgery should be directed?

Authors:  Lucyna Kepka; Joanna Socha
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  The Role of Surgical Resection in Stage IIIA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Decision and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

Authors:  Pamela Samson; Aalok Patel; Cliff G Robinson; Daniel Morgensztern; Su-Hsin Chang; Graham A Colditz; Saiama Waqar; Traves D Crabtree; A Sasha Krupnick; Daniel Kreisel; G Alexander Patterson; Bryan F Meyers; Varun Puri
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Pathologic Upstaging in Patients Undergoing Resection for Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Are There Modifiable Predictors?

Authors:  Matthew J Bott; Aalok P Patel; Traves D Crabtree; Graham A Colditz; Daniel Kreisel; A Sasha Krupnick; G Alexander Patterson; Stephen Broderick; Bryan F Meyers; Varun Puri
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  Evolution and science, progress and change.

Authors:  Frank C Detterbeck
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 9.139

5.  PET-CT in the staging and treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Patricia Ibeas; Blanca Cantos; José Manuel Gasent; Begoña Rodríguez; Mariano Provencio
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 6.  The role of endobronchial ultrasound versus mediastinoscopy for non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Katarzyna Czarnecka-Kujawa; Kazuhiro Yasufuku
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 7.  Lung cancer staging: an overview of the new staging system and implications for radiographic clinical staging.

Authors:  Joshua Carson; David J Finley
Journal:  Semin Roentgenol       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 0.800

Review 8.  Controversies regarding T status and N status for non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Yanli Mo; Jiayin Peng; Wenmei Su; Xinggui Chen; Aibing Wu; Jinmei Li; Zhixiong Yang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-07-15

Review 9.  A systematic review of PET and PET/CT in oncology: a way to personalize cancer treatment in a cost-effective manner?

Authors:  Astrid Langer
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  The impact on the prognosis of unsuspected N2 disease in non-small-cell lung cancer: indications for thorough mediastinal staging in the modern era.

Authors:  Ryosuke Tachi; Aritoshi Hattori; Takeshi Matsunaga; Kazuya Takamochi; Shiaki Oh; Kenji Suzuki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 2.549

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.