Literature DB >> 16580376

Effects of recombinant human luteinizing hormone supplementation on ovarian stimulation and the implantation rate in down-regulated women of advanced reproductive age.

Francisco Fábregues1, Montserrat Creus, Joana Peñarrubia, Dolors Manau, Juan A Vanrell, Juan Balasch.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of recombinant human luteinizing hormone (rhLH) supplementation on ovarian stimulation and implantation rate in down-regulated women of advanced reproductive age.
DESIGN: Prospective randomized study.
SETTING: University teaching hospital. PATIENT(S): A total of 120 consecutive normogonadotropic infertile women > or = 35 years old undergoing their first cycle of IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatment. INTERVENTION(S): Ovarian stimulation in a long agonist protocol with a combination of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (rhFSH) and rhLH (group 1, n = 60) starting on day 6 of FSH stimulation until hCG at a daily fixed dose of 150 IU of rhLH, or with rhFSH alone (group 2, n = 60). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Ovarian stimulation characteristics, ovum retrieval, and IVF/ICSI outcome. RESULT(S): The mean number of intermediate (10-14 mm) and large (> 14- < 18 mm) but not leading (> or = 18 mm) follicles was significantly lower in group 1 on the day of hCG injection. The oocyte yield and maturity as well as the number of oocytes fertilized were significantly higher in group 2 than in group 1. However, the number of patients having embryo transfer (n = 55 in both treatment groups), the number and quality of embryos replaced, the implantation rate (20.6% vs. 21.7%) and clinical pregnancy rates per embryo transfer (44% vs. 45%) were similar in groups 1 and 2. CONCLUSION(S): The rhLH supplementation does not increase ovarian response and implantation rates in patients of older reproductive age stimulated with rhFSH under pituitary suppression for assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16580376     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.09.049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  11 in total

1.  Outcome of in vitro fertilization in patients with proven poor ovarian responsiveness after early vs. mid-follicular LH exposure: a prospective, randomized, controlled study.

Authors:  Alberto Revelli; Alessandra Chiado'; Daniela Guidetti; Francesca Bongioanni; Valentina Rovei; Gianluca Gennarelli
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 2.  Lutropin alfa.

Authors:  Sohita Dhillon; Gillian M Keating
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Efficacy of low dose hCG on oocyte maturity for ovarian stimulation in poor responder women undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycle: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Tahereh Madani; Ladan Mohammadi Yeganeh; Shabnam Khodabakhshi; Mohammad Reza Akhoond; Fatemeh Hasani
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Follicular fluid hormonal profile and cumulus cell gene expression in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with recombinant FSH: effects of recombinant LH administration.

Authors:  Marzia Barberi; Beatrice Ermini; Maria Beatrice Morelli; Michele Ermini; Sandra Cecconi; Rita Canipari
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Controlled Ovarian Stimulation with recombinant-FSH plus recombinant-LH vs. human Menopausal Gonadotropin based on the number of retrieved oocytes: results from a routine clinical practice in a real-life population.

Authors:  Alberto Revelli; Grazia Pettinau; Gemma Basso; Andrea Carosso; Alessandro Ferrero; Cecilia Dallan; Stefano Canosa; Gianluca Gennarelli; Daniela Guidetti; Claudia Filippini; Chiara Benedetto
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2015-07-25       Impact factor: 5.211

6.  Effects of artificial cycles with and without gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist pretreatment on frozen embryo transfer outcomes.

Authors:  Qianrong Qi; Jin Luo; Yaqin Wang; Qingzhen Xie
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 1.671

Review 7.  Biological versus chronological ovarian age: implications for assisted reproductive technology.

Authors:  Carlo Alviggi; Peter Humaidan; Colin M Howles; Donald Tredway; Stephen G Hillier
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 5.211

8.  Recombinant human luteinizing hormone co-treatment in ovarian stimulation for assisted reproductive technology in women of advanced reproductive age: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Alessandro Conforti; Sandro C Esteves; Peter Humaidan; Salvatore Longobardi; Thomas D'Hooghe; Raoul Orvieto; Alberto Vaiarelli; Danilo Cimadomo; Laura Rienzi; Filippo Maria Ubaldi; Fulvio Zullo; Carlo Alviggi
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 5.211

9.  Effects of human menopausal gonadotropin on zona pellucida and pregnancy outcomes of ovarian stimulation protocols.

Authors:  Bing He; Cheng Junping; Huang Li; Tan Weihong; Xue Lintao; Wang Shikai
Journal:  Iran J Reprod Med       Date:  2015-06

Review 10.  Recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (r-hFSH) plus recombinant luteinizing hormone versus r-hFSH alone for ovarian stimulation during assisted reproductive technology: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Philippe Lehert; Efstratios M Kolibianakis; Christos A Venetis; Joan Schertz; Helen Saunders; Pablo Arriagada; Samuel Copt; Basil Tarlatzis
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 5.211

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.