Literature DB >> 16580278

Myth of the ideal cesarean section rate: commentary and historic perspective.

Ronald M Cyr1.   

Abstract

Attempts to define, or enforce, an "ideal" cesarean section rate are futile, and should be abandoned. The cesarean rate is a consequence of individual value-laden clinical decisions, and is not amenable to the methods of evidence-based medicine. The influence of academic authority figures on the cesarean rate in the US is placed in historic context. Like other population health indices, the cesarean section rate is an indirect result of American public policy during the last century. Without major changes in the way health and maternity care are delivered in the US, the rate will continue to increase without improving population outcomes.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16580278     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.10.199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  9 in total

1.  Primary cesarean deliveries prior to labor in the United States, 1979-2004.

Authors:  Jutta M Joesch; Ginger L Gossman; Koray Tanfer
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2007-07-24

2.  Cesarean section rate in Iran, multidimensional approaches for behavioral change of providers: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Bahareh Yazdizadeh; Saharnaz Nedjat; Kazem Mohammad; Arash Rashidian; Nasrin Changizi; Reza Majdzadeh
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  Incidence of cesarean section at the department of gynecology and obstetrics of hospital in travnik during 2012.

Authors:  Mohammad Abou El-Ardat; Sebija Izetbegovic; Amin Djulabic; Aldina Hozic
Journal:  Mater Sociomed       Date:  2014-02-20

4.  Frequency of vaginal birth after cesarean section at clinic of gynecology and obstetrics in sarajevo.

Authors:  Mohammad Abou El-Ardat; Sebija Izetbegovic; Eldar Mehmedbasic; Mahira Duric
Journal:  Med Arch       Date:  2013-12-28

5.  Fear, Risk, and the Responsible Choice: Risk Narratives and Lowering the Rate of Caesarean Sections in High-income Countries.

Authors:  Helga Hallgrimsdottir; Leah Shumka; Catherine Althaus; Cecilia Benoit
Journal:  AIMS Public Health       Date:  2017-12-26

6.  The application of the Ten Group classification system (TGCS) in caesarean delivery case mix adjustment. A multicenter prospective study.

Authors:  Gianpaolo Maso; Salvatore Alberico; Lorenzo Monasta; Luca Ronfani; Marcella Montico; Caterina Businelli; Valentina Soini; Monica Piccoli; Carmine Gigli; Daniele Domini; Claudio Fiscella; Sara Casarsa; Carlo Zompicchiatti; Michela De Agostinis; Attilio D'Atri; Raffaela Mugittu; Santo La Valle; Cristina Di Leonardo; Valter Adamo; Silvia Smiroldo; Giovanni Del Frate; Monica Olivuzzi; Silvio Giove; Maria Parente; Daniele Bassini; Simona Melazzini; Secondo Guaschino; Francesco De Seta; Sergio Demarini; Laura Travan; Diego Marchesoni; Alberto Rossi; Giorgio Simon; Sandro Zicari; Giorgio Tamburlini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Evaluation of sale maternity clinic of obstetrics, clinical center of sarajevo university in 2012th year.

Authors:  Mohammad Abou El-Ardat; Sebija Izetbegovic
Journal:  Mater Sociomed       Date:  2013-11-24

Review 8.  What do popular Spanish women's magazines say about caesarean section? A 21-year survey.

Authors:  M R Torloni; B Campos Mansilla; M Merialdi; A P Betrán
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 6.531

9.  A global reference for caesarean section rates (C-Model): a multicountry cross-sectional study.

Authors:  J P Souza; A P Betran; A Dumont; B de Mucio; C M Gibbs Pickens; C Deneux-Tharaux; E Ortiz-Panozo; E Sullivan; E Ota; G Togoobaatar; G Carroli; H Knight; J Zhang; J G Cecatti; J P Vogel; K Jayaratne; M C Leal; M Gissler; N Morisaki; N Lack; O T Oladapo; Ö Tunçalp; P Lumbiganon; R Mori; S Quintana; A D Costa Passos; A C Marcolin; A Zongo; B Blondel; B Hernández; C J Hogue; C Prunet; C Landman; C Ochir; C Cuesta; C Pileggi-Castro; D Walker; D Alves; E Abalos; Ecd Moises; E M Vieira; G Duarte; G Perdona; I Gurol-Urganci; K Takahiko; L Moscovici; L Campodonico; L Oliveira-Ciabati; M Laopaiboon; M Danansuriya; M Nakamura-Pereira; M L Costa; M R Torloni; M R Kramer; P Borges; P B Olkhanud; R Pérez-Cuevas; S B Agampodi; S Mittal; S Serruya; V Bataglia; Z Li; M Temmerman; A M Gülmezoglu
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 6.531

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.