Literature DB >> 16580274

Vital considerations for the use of vital statistics in obstetrical research.

Alison G Cahill, George A Macones.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2006        PMID： 16580274     DOI： 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.02.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN： 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


× No keyword cloud information.
  6 in total

1.  Assessing the validity and reliability of three indicators self-reported on the pregnancy risk assessment monitoring system survey.

Authors:  Indu B Ahluwalia; Kristen Helms; Brian Morrow
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  To What Extent Is the Association Between Race/Ethnicity and Fetal Growth Restriction Explained by Adequacy of Prenatal Care? A Mediation Analysis of a Retrospectively Selected Cohort.

Authors:  Khalidha Nasiri; Erica E M Moodie; Haim A Abenhaim
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Birth order of twins and risk of perinatal death related to delivery in England, Northern Ireland, and Wales, 1994-2003: retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Gordon C S Smith; Kate M Fleming; Ian R White
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-03-02

4.  Variation in caesarean section rates in the US: outliers, damned outliers, and statistics.

Authors:  Gordon C S Smith
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 11.069

5.  Examining interpregnancy intervals and maternal and perinatal health outcomes using U.S. vital records: Important considerations for analysis and interpretation.

Authors:  Marie E Thoma; Dane A De Silva; Marian F MacDorman
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 3.980

6.  Maternal Obesity and Rectovaginal Group B Streptococcus Colonization at Term.

Authors:  Shelby M Kleweis; Alison G Cahill; Anthony O Odibo; Methodius G Tuuli
Journal:  Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-08-02
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.