Literature DB >> 16580272

Trabecular bone density of male human cervical and lumbar vertebrae.

Narayan Yoganandan1, Frank A Pintar, Brian D Stemper, Jamie L Baisden, Recyi Aktay, Barry S Shender, Glenn Paskoff, Purushottam Laud.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the bone mineral density (BMD) of cervical vertebrae and correlate with the lumbar spine. Fifty-seven young adult healthy male volunteers, ranging from 18 to 41 years of age, underwent quantitative computed tomography (QCT) scanning of C2-T1 and L2-L4 vertebrae. To account for correlations, repeated measures techniques were used to compare data as a function of spinal level and region. Linear regression methods were used (+/-95% CI) to compare data as a function of spinal level and region. The mean age and body height were 25.0 +/- 5.8 years and 181.0 +/- 7.6 cm. BMD decreased from the rostral to caudal direction along the spinal column. Grouped data indicated that the neck is the densest followed by the first thoracic vertebra and low back with mean BMD of 256.0 +/- 48.1, 194.3 +/- 44.2, and 172.2 +/- 28.4 mg/cm(3), respectively; differences were statistically significant. While BMD did not vary significantly between the three lumbar bodies, neck vertebrae demonstrated significant trends. The matrix of correlation coefficients between BMD and spinal level indicated that the relationship is strong in the lumbar (r = 0.92-0.96) and cervical (r = 0.73-0.92) spines. Data from the present study show that the trabecular bony architecture of the neck is significantly different from the low back. These quantitative BMD data from a controlled young adult healthy human male volunteer population may be valuable in establishing normative data specifically for the neck. From a trabecular bone density perspective, these results indicate that lumbar vertebrae cannot act as the best surrogates for neck vertebrae. Significant variations in densities among neck vertebrae, unlike the low back counterpart, may underscore the need to treat these bones as different structures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16580272     DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2006.01.160

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  26 in total

1.  Paget disease of the spine: an evaluation of 101 patients with a histomorphometric analysis of 29 cases.

Authors:  Jan M Pestka; Sebastian Seitz; Jozef Zustin; Klaus Püschel; Michael Amling; Florian Barvencik
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-12-31       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Locally measured microstructural parameters are better associated with vertebral strength than whole bone density.

Authors:  J Hazrati Marangalou; F Eckstein; V Kuhn; K Ito; M Cataldi; F Taddei; B van Rietbergen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Quantitative dual-energy CT for phantomless evaluation of cancellous bone mineral density of the vertebral pedicle: correlation with pedicle screw pull-out strength.

Authors:  Julian L Wichmann; Christian Booz; Stefan Wesarg; Ralf W Bauer; J Matthias Kerl; Sebastian Fischer; Thomas Lehnert; Thomas J Vogl; M Fawad Khan; Konstantinos Kafchitsas
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Cervical spine bone density in young healthy adults as a function of sex, vertebral level and anatomic location.

Authors:  William J Anderst; Tyler West; William F Donaldson; Joon Y Lee
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-05-06       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Quantitative analyses of pediatric cervical spine ossification patterns using computed tomography.

Authors:  Narayan Yoganandan; Frank A Pintar; Sean M Lew; Raj D Rao; Nagarajan Rangarajan
Journal:  Ann Adv Automot Med       Date:  2011

Review 6.  Bone three-dimensional microstructural features of the common osteoporotic fracture sites.

Authors:  Huayue Chen; Kin-Ya Kubo
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2014-09-18

7.  Cervical spine bone mineral density as a function of vertebral level and anatomic location.

Authors:  William J Anderst; Eric D Thorhauer; Joon Y Lee; William F Donaldson; James D Kang
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.166

8.  Influence of cervical bone mineral density on cage subsidence in patients following stand-alone anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Authors:  Christopher Brenke; Martin Dostal; Johann Scharf; Christel Weiß; Kirsten Schmieder; Martin Barth
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Biomechanical properties of human thoracic spine disc segments.

Authors:  Brian D Stemper; Derek Board; Narayan Yoganandan; Christopher E Wolfla
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2010-01

10.  Relationship between tumor volume and quantitative values calculated using two-dimensional bone scan images.

Authors:  Shota Hosokawa; Kazumasa Inoue; Yasuyuki Takahashi; Kazunori Kawakami; Daisuke Kano; Yoshihiro Nakagami; Masahiro Fukushi
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2017-10-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.