Literature DB >> 16580127

Is love of nature in the US becoming love of electronic media? 16-year downtrend in national park visits explained by watching movies, playing video games, internet use, and oil prices.

Oliver R W Pergams1, Patricia A Zaradic.   

Abstract

After 50 years of steady increase, per capita visits to US national parks have declined since 1988. This decline, coincident with the rise in electronic entertainment media, may represent a shift in recreation choices with broader implications for the value placed on biodiversity conservation and environmentally responsible behavior. We compared the decline in per capita visits with a set of indicators representing alternate recreation choices and constraints. The Spearman correlation analyses found this decline in NPV to be significantly negatively correlated with several electronic entertainment indicators: hours of television, (rs=-0.743, P<0.001), video games (rs=-0.773, P<0.001), home movies (rs=-0.788, P<0.001), theatre attendance (rs=-0.587, P<0.025) and internet use (rs=-0.783, P<0.001). There were also significant negative correlations with oil prices (rs=-0.547, P<0.025), foreign travel (rs=-0.452, P<0.05), and Appalachian Trail hikers (rs=-0.785, P<0.001). Income was significantly positively correlated with foreign travel (rs=0.621, P<0.005) but negatively correlated with national park visits (rs=-0.697, P<0.005). There was no significant correlation of mean number of vacation days, indicating available vacation time is probably not a factor. Federal funding actually increased during this period, and so was rejected as a probable factor. Park capacity was rejected as limiting since both total overnight stays and visits at the seven most popular parks rose well into the mid-1990s. Aging of baby boomers was also rejected as they are only now reaching retirement age, and thus during the period of visitation decline were still of prime family vacation age. Multiple linear regression of four of the entertainment media variables as well as oil prices explains 97.5% of this recent decline (r=0.975, multiple r2=0.950, adjusted multiple r2=0.925, SE=0.015, F=37.800, P<0.0001). We may be seeing evidence of a fundamental shift away from people's appreciation of nature (biophilia, Wilson 1984) to 'videophilia,' which we here define as "the new human tendency to focus on sedentary activities involving electronic media." Such a shift would not bode well for the future of biodiversity conservation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16580127     DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.02.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Manage        ISSN: 0301-4797            Impact factor:   6.789


  25 in total

1.  Ominous trends in nature recreation.

Authors:  Peter Kareiva
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-02-19       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Evidence for a fundamental and pervasive shift away from nature-based recreation.

Authors:  Oliver R W Pergams; Patricia A Zaradic
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-02-04       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Who visits a national park and what do they get out of it?: a joint visitor cluster analysis and travel cost model for Yellowstone National Park.

Authors:  Charles Benson; Philip Watson; Garth Taylor; Philip Cook; Steve Hollenhorst
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  The ecology of human-nature interactions.

Authors:  Masashi Soga; Kevin J Gaston
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  The importance of urban gardens in supporting children's biophilia.

Authors:  Kathryn L Hand; Claire Freeman; Philip J Seddon; Mariano R Recio; Aviva Stein; Yolanda van Heezik
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-12-27       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Colloquium paper: where does biodiversity go from here? A grim business-as-usual forecast and a hopeful portfolio of partial solutions.

Authors:  Paul R Ehrlich; Robert M Pringle
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-08-11       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Children prioritize virtual exotic biodiversity over local biodiversity.

Authors:  Jean-Marie Ballouard; François Brischoux; Xavier Bonnet
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Vis Medicatrix naturae: does nature "minister to the mind"?

Authors:  Alan C Logan; Eva M Selhub
Journal:  Biopsychosoc Med       Date:  2012-04-03

9.  Creativity in the wild: improving creative reasoning through immersion in natural settings.

Authors:  Ruth Ann Atchley; David L Strayer; Paul Atchley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Biophilia: does visual contact with nature impact on health and well-being?

Authors:  Bjørn Grinde; Grete Grindal Patil
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2009-08-31       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.