Literature DB >> 16579985

Low frequency temporal modulation of light promotes a myopic shift in refractive compensation to all spectacle lenses.

Sheila G Crewther1, Ayla Barutchu, Melanie J Murphy, David P Crewther.   

Abstract

Emmetropization, the process by which ocular growth of young animals adapts to ensure focussed retinal images, can be disrupted by high frequency flicker, causing a hypermetropic shift. Emmetropization can also be disrupted differentially, in a sign dependent manner, by pharmacological alteration of the balance of activation of the ON and OFF retinal sub-systems in normal light or by rearing in an environment with a moving spatiotemporally varied diamond pattern (yielding local sawtooth illumination on the retina). Thus the aim of this experiment was to determine whether low frequency temporal modulation alone was sufficient to cause defocus sign-dependent interference with compensation. Chicks were reared for 6 or 7 days with monocular +/-10 D, 0 D, or No Lenses in a 12h light/dark cycle. Luminance of the environment was temporally modulated during the light cycle with a non-square wave profile pulse of 250 msec duration, with the illumination fluctuating between 1.5 and 180 lux at 1 Hz, 2 Hz, 4 Hz or with no flicker (0 Hz-180 lux). Final refractive state and ocular dimensions, measured using retinoscopy and A-scan ultrasonography, demonstrated that in the absence of temporal luminance modulation (0 Hz), chicks compensated to induced defocus in the expected sign-dependent manner. However, under 1, 2 and 4 Hz flickering light conditions, there was an overall myopic offset of approximately 6D across lens groups with refractive compensation to positive lenses more strongly inhibited. This myopic offset was reflected by increases in the depth of both vitreous and anterior chambers. However, luminance modulation had no effect on refraction or ocular parameters in the No Lens conditions. This is a hitherto unreported strong interaction between lens wear and low frequency temporally modulated light, with the refractive compensation mechanism being overridden by a generalized myopic shift.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16579985     DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2005.12.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Eye Res        ISSN: 0014-4835            Impact factor:   3.467


  22 in total

1.  Chicks use changes in luminance and chromatic contrast as indicators of the sign of defocus.

Authors:  Frances J Rucker; Josh Wallman
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Blue Light Protects Against Temporal Frequency Sensitive Refractive Changes.

Authors:  Frances Rucker; Stephanie Britton; Molly Spatcher; Stephan Hanowsky
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Light modulation, not choroidal vasomotor action, is a regulator of refractive compensation to signed optical blur.

Authors:  Melanie J Murphy; David P Crewther; Melinda J Goodyear; Sheila G Crewther
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 8.739

4.  The role of temporal contrast and blue light in emmetropization.

Authors:  Frances Rucker; Mark Henriksen; Tiffany Yanase; Christopher Taylor
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 5.  Which lamp will be optimum to eye? Incandescent, fluorescent or LED etc.

Authors:  Liang Chen; Xiao-Wei Zhang
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 1.779

6.  The wavelength composition and temporal modulation of ambient lighting strongly affect refractive development in young tree shrews.

Authors:  Timothy J Gawne; John T Siegwart; Alexander H Ward; Thomas T Norton
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 3.467

7.  Quantifying light exposure patterns in young adult students.

Authors:  Amanda A Alvarez; Christine F Wildsoet
Journal:  J Mod Opt       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 1.464

8.  Effect of green flickering light on myopia development and expression of M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor in guinea pigs.

Authors:  Yuan Tao; Xiao-Li Li; Li-Yuan Sun; Yu-Hua Wei; Xiao-Ting Yu; Hong Wang
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-11-18       Impact factor: 1.779

9.  Spatial and temporal dissociation of AQP4 and Kir4.1 expression during induction of refractive errors.

Authors:  Melinda J Goodyear; Sheila G Crewther; Melanie J Murphy; Loretta Giummarra; Agnes Hazi; Barbara M Junghans; David P Crewther
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2010-08-14       Impact factor: 2.367

Review 10.  Temporal integration of visual signals in lens compensation (a review).

Authors:  Xiaoying Zhu
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 3.467

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.