Literature DB >> 16579950

The risk of hydrosalpinx formation and adnexectomy following tubal ligation and subsequent hysterectomy: a historical cohort study.

Abraham N Morse1, Clayton B Schroeder, Javier F Magrina, Maurice J Webb, Peter C Wollan, Barbara P Yawn.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to further investigate a previous finding that tubal sterilization followed by hysterectomy was associated with hydrosalpinx formation. STUDY
DESIGN: The Rochester Epidemiology Project (Rochester, MN) was used to identify three cohorts: women who had undergone tubal sterilization and subsequent hysterectomy, women who had undergone tubal sterilization alone, and women who had undergone hysterectomy alone. Four hundred seventy-three charts were reviewed and 337 met inclusion criteria. Patient histories were analyzed prospectively, looking for subsequent adnexal surgery.
RESULTS: There was no increased risk of hydrosalpinx formation in patients who had undergone tubal sterilization and hysterectomy, compared with tubal sterilization alone. The proportion of subjects undergoing later adnexectomy for any reason was significantly higher in the hysterectomy groups, compared with the sterilization only group (relative risk 3.5, 95% confidence interval 1.3-9.4).
CONCLUSION: This prospective study does not support the previously reported case-control data suggesting that tubal sterilization followed by hysterectomy resulted in an increased risk of hydrosalpinx formation, compared with tubal sterilization alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16579950     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.11.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  7 in total

1.  Predicted probabilities' relationship to inclusion probabilities.

Authors:  Di Fang; Jenny Chong; Jeffrey R Wilson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Prophylactic bilateral salpingectomy (PBS) to reduce ovarian cancer risk incorporated in standard premenopausal hysterectomy: complications and re-operation rate.

Authors:  J Vorwergk; M P Radosa; K Nicolaus; N Baus; J Jimenez Cruz; M Rengsberger; M Gajda; H Diebolder; I B Runnebaum
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  Salpingectomy as standard at hysterectomy? A Danish cohort study, 1977-2010.

Authors:  Rikke Guldberg; Sonja Wehberg; Charlotte Wessel Skovlund; Ole Mogensen; Ojvind Lidegaard
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Ovarian cancer risk reduction through opportunistic salpingectomy.

Authors:  Janice S Kwon
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.401

Review 5.  Opportunistic salpingectomy for ovarian cancer prevention.

Authors:  Gillian E Hanley; Jessica N McAlpine; Janice S Kwon; Gillian Mitchell
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Res Pract       Date:  2015-09-17

6.  Survey: acceptability of opportunistic bilateral salpingectomy in Flanders.

Authors:  A S Maryns; A Makar; T Hamerlynck; B De Vree; P Tummers; W A A Tjalma
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2021-09

Review 7.  Non-neoplastic diseases of the fallopian tube: MR imaging with emphasis on diffusion-weighted imaging.

Authors:  Pietro Valerio Foti; Noemi Ognibene; Saveria Spadola; Rosario Caltabiano; Renato Farina; Stefano Palmucci; Pietro Milone; Giovanni Carlo Ettorre
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2016-03-18
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.