Literature DB >> 16579787

Evaluation of antimicrobial susceptibility patterns in Campylobacter spp isolated from dairy cattle and farms managed organically and conventionally in the midwestern and northeastern United States.

Lisa W Halbert1, John B Kaneene, Pamela L Ruegg, Lorin D Warnick, Scott J Wells, Linda S Mansfield, Charles P Fossler, Amy M Campbell, Angela M Geiger-Zwald.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe antimicrobial susceptibility patterns in Campylobacter spp isolated from dairy cattle and farms managed organically and conventionally in the midwestern and northeastern United States.
DESIGN: Longitudinal study. SAMPLE POPULATION: 128 farms. PROCEDURE: Samples and data were collected every 2 months from August 2000 to October 2001. Fecal samples were collected from calves and cows. Milk samples were obtained from the bulk tank and milk line filters. Environmental samples were obtained from a water source, feed bunks of lactating cows, and cattle housing areas. Campylobacter identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing were performed at a central laboratory by use of microbroth dilution with 2 customized antimicrobial susceptibility panels.
RESULTS: 460 and 1,570 Campylobacter isolates were obtained from organic and conventional dairy farms, respectively. Most isolates from both farm types were susceptible to most antimicrobial agents tested, and antimicrobial susceptibility of conventional dairy isolates was decreased, compared with organic dairy isolates. Low proportions of isolates resistant to ampicillin (< 10%) and moderate proportions resistant (30% to 60%) to kanamycin, sulfamethoxazole, and tetracycline were observed on both farm types. The proportion of isolates resistant to tetracycline was higher for conventional than organic farms. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Campylobacter isolates from dairy cattle and farms managed organically and conventionally had similar patterns of antimicrobial resistance; the proportion of resistant isolates was higher for conventional than organic farms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16579787     DOI: 10.2460/javma.228.7.1074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Vet Med Assoc        ISSN: 0003-1488            Impact factor:   1.936


  15 in total

1.  Changes in multidrug resistance of enteric bacteria following an intervention to reduce antimicrobial resistance in dairy calves.

Authors:  John B Kaneene; Lorin D Warnick; Carole A Bolin; Ronald J Erskine; Katherine May; Roseann Miller
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Comparison of the Transport of Tetracycline-Resistant and Tetracycline-Susceptible Escherichia coli Isolated from Lake Michigan.

Authors:  Jacob J Walczak; Sonia L Bardy; Lucia Feriancikova; Shangping Xu
Journal:  Water Air Soil Pollut       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 2.520

3.  Subtype-Specific Selection for Resistance to Fluoroquinolones but Not to Tetracyclines Is Evident in Campylobacter jejuni Isolates from Beef Cattle in Confined Feeding Operations in Southern Alberta, Canada.

Authors:  Andrew L Webb; L Brent Selinger; Eduardo N Taboada; G Douglas Inglis
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Influence of tetracycline resistance on the transport of manure-derived Escherichia coli in saturated porous media.

Authors:  Jacob J Walczak; Sonia L Bardy; Lucia Feriancikova; Shangping Xu
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 11.236

5.  Changes in tetracycline susceptibility of enteric bacteria following switching to nonmedicated milk replacer for dairy calves.

Authors:  John B Kaneene; Lorin D Warnick; Carole A Bolin; Ronald J Erskine; Katherine May; Roseann Miller
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-04-16       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Contamination of Retail Meat Samples with Multidrug-Resistant Organisms in Relation to Organic and Conventional Production and Processing: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Data from the United States National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System, 2012-2017.

Authors:  Gabriel K Innes; Keeve E Nachman; Alison G Abraham; Joan A Casey; Andrew N Patton; Lance B Price; Sara Y Tartof; Meghan F Davis
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 7.  Scoping review to identify potential non-antimicrobial interventions to mitigate antimicrobial resistance in commensal enteric bacteria in North American cattle production systems.

Authors:  C P Murphy; V R Fajt; H M Scott; M J Foster; P Wickwire; S A McEwen
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 2.451

Review 8.  Antimicrobial usage and resistance in beef production.

Authors:  Andrew Cameron; Tim A McAllister
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2016-12-12

9.  Metagenomic Analysis of Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Dairy Cow Feces following Therapeutic Administration of Third Generation Cephalosporin.

Authors:  Lindsey Chambers; Ying Yang; Heather Littier; Partha Ray; Tong Zhang; Amy Pruden; Michael Strickland; Katharine Knowlton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Association between community socioeconomic factors, animal feeding operations, and campylobacteriosis incidence rates: Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network (FoodNet), 2004-2010.

Authors:  Rachel E Rosenberg Goldstein; Raul Cruz-Cano; Chengsheng Jiang; Amanda Palmer; David Blythe; Patricia Ryan; Brenna Hogan; Benjamin White; John R Dunn; Tanya Libby; Melissa Tobin-D'Angelo; Jennifer Y Huang; Suzanne McGuire; Karen Scherzinger; Mei-Ling Ting Lee; Amy R Sapkota
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 3.090

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.