Literature DB >> 16579020

Breast cancer screening in Canada: a review.

Nancy Wadden1, Gregory P Doyle.   

Abstract

Organized screening for breast cancer in Canada began in 1988 and has been implemented in all provinces and 2 of the 3 territories. Quality initiatives are promoted through national guidelines which detail best practices in various areas, including achieving quality through a client-service approach, recruitment and capacity, retention, quality of mammography, reporting, communication of results, follow-up and diagnostic workup, and program evaluation; it also offers detailed guidelines for the pathological examination and reporting of breast specimens. The Canadian Breast Cancer Data Base is a national breast cancer screening surveillance system whose objective is to collect information from provincial-screening programs. These data are used to monitor and evaluate the performance of programs and allow comparison with national and international results. A series of standardized performance indicators and targets for the evaluation of performance and quality of organized breast cancer screening programs have been developed from the data base. Although health care is a provincial responsibility in Canada, the collective reporting and comparison of results both nationally and internationally is beneficial in evaluating and refining both screening programs and individual radiologist performance. The results of Canadian performance indicators compare favourably with those of other well-established international screening programs. There are variations in performance indicators across the provinces and territories, but these differences are not extreme.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16579020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Assoc Radiol J        ISSN: 0846-5371            Impact factor:   2.248


  6 in total

1.  Patterns and Predictors of Screening for Breast and Cervical Cancer in Women with CKD.

Authors:  Germaine Wong; Jade S Hayward; Eric McArthur; Jonathan C Craig; Danielle M Nash; Stephanie N Dixon; Deborah Zimmerman; Abhijat Kitchlu; Amit X Garg
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 8.237

2.  Associations of physician supplies with breast cancer stage at diagnosis and survival in Ontario, 1988 to 2006.

Authors:  Kevin M Gorey; Isaac N Luginaah; Eric J Holowaty; Karen Y Fung; Caroline Hamm
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Women's views on reminder letters for screening mammography: Mixed methods study of women from 23 family health networks.

Authors:  Janusz Kaczorowski; Tina Karwalajtys; Lynne Lohfeld; Stephanie Laryea; Kelly Anderson; Stefanie Roder; Rolf J Sebaldt
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  A workstation-integrated peer review quality assurance program: pilot study.

Authors:  Margaret M O'Keeffe; Todd M Davis; Kerry Siminoski
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 1.930

5.  Automatic detection of anomalies in screening mammograms.

Authors:  Edward J Kendall; Michael G Barnett; Krista Chytyk-Praznik
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 1.930

6.  Factors influencing mammography participation in Canada: an integrative review of the literature.

Authors:  K Hanson; P Montgomery; D Bakker; M Conlon
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.677

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.