BACKGROUND:People with severe mental illness and substance use disorders (dual disorder) often have considerable contact with the criminal justice system. AIMS: To test the effects of client characteristics on six criminal justice outcomes among homeless (at intake) people with mental illness and substance misuse disorders. METHODS: The sample was of participants in a randomized controlled trial comparing standard treatment, assertive community treatment (ACT) and integrated treatment (IT). Data were analysed using hierarchical logistic regression. RESULTS: Half the sample was arrested and a quarter incarcerated during the two-year follow-up period. The regression models explained between 22% and 35% of the variance of the following criminal justice measures: (1) major offences, (2) minor offences, (3) substance-use-related offences, (4) incarcerations, (5) arrests, and (6) summons. Prior criminal behaviour was the strongest predictor of all of the dependent variables; in general, demographic and diagnostic variables were not. Similarly, neither the type nor the amount of mental health treatment received predicted subsequent criminal behaviour. CONCLUSION: Elsewhere the authors have shown that ACT and IT had advantages for health and stability of accommodation but these analyses suggest that more specialized interventions are needed to reduce criminal behaviour in dual disorder individuals. Copyright 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:People with severe mental illness and substance use disorders (dual disorder) often have considerable contact with the criminal justice system. AIMS: To test the effects of client characteristics on six criminal justice outcomes among homeless (at intake) people with mental illness and substance misuse disorders. METHODS: The sample was of participants in a randomized controlled trial comparing standard treatment, assertive community treatment (ACT) and integrated treatment (IT). Data were analysed using hierarchical logistic regression. RESULTS: Half the sample was arrested and a quarter incarcerated during the two-year follow-up period. The regression models explained between 22% and 35% of the variance of the following criminal justice measures: (1) major offences, (2) minor offences, (3) substance-use-related offences, (4) incarcerations, (5) arrests, and (6) summons. Prior criminal behaviour was the strongest predictor of all of the dependent variables; in general, demographic and diagnostic variables were not. Similarly, neither the type nor the amount of mental health treatment received predicted subsequent criminal behaviour. CONCLUSION: Elsewhere the authors have shown that ACT and IT had advantages for health and stability of accommodation but these analyses suggest that more specialized interventions are needed to reduce criminal behaviour in dual disorder individuals. Copyright 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Authors: Renée de Vet; Maurice J A van Luijtelaar; Sonja N Brilleslijper-Kater; Wouter Vanderplasschen; Mariëlle D Beijersbergen; Judith R L M Wolf Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2013-08-15 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Karin M Eyrich-Garg; John S Cacciola; Deni Carise; Kevin G Lynch; A Thomas McLellan Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2008-05-26 Impact factor: 4.328
Authors: Marisa Elena Domino; Alex Gertner; Brigid Grabert; Gary S Cuddeback; Trenita Childers; Joseph P Morrissey Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2019-03-04 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: J Steven Lamberti; Robert L Weisman; Catherine Cerulli; Geoffrey C Williams; David B Jacobowitz; Kim T Mueser; Patricia D Marks; Robert L Strawderman; Donald Harrington; Tara A Lamberti; Eric D Caine Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2017-06-01 Impact factor: 3.084