Literature DB >> 16575376

The potentially somatizing effect of clinical consultation.

Peter Salmon1.   

Abstract

Many patients who present physical symptoms that their doctors cannot explain by physical disease have persisting symptoms and impairment. An influential view has been that such symptoms are the somatization of emotional distress, but there has also been concern that medical practice contributes to shaping these presentations. Analysis of patients' accounts indicate that they approach these consultations with a sense of being the expert on the nature and reality of their symptoms and, in primary care at least, they seek convincing explanations, engagement, and support. They often describe doctors as doubting that their symptoms are real and as not taking their symptoms seriously. Observational research has demonstrated that patients presenting idiopathic symptoms in primary care generally provide cues to their need for explanation or to psychosocial difficulties. Their doctors tend to provide simple reassurance rather than detailed explanations, and often disregard psychosocial cues. Patients seem to intensify their presentation in consequence, elaborating and extending their accounts of their symptoms, perhaps in the effort to engage their doctors and demonstrate the reality of their symptoms. When doctors propose physical investigation and treatment in response to such escalating presentation, they thereby inadvertently somatize patients' psychological presentation. Consultations, therefore, have elements of contest, whereby patients seek engagement from doctors who seek to disengage. Although provision of a medical label, such as a functional diagnosis, can legitimize patients' complaints and avoid contest, this is at the risk of indicating that medicine can take responsibility for managing the symptoms. More collaborative relationships rely on doctors recognizing patients' authority in knowing about their symptoms, and providing tangible explanations that make sense to the patient and allow them to tolerate or manage the symptoms. Researchers need to study how doctors can best achieve these aims within routine consultations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16575376     DOI: 10.1017/s109285290001436x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CNS Spectr        ISSN: 1092-8529            Impact factor:   3.790


  9 in total

Review 1.  Fibromyalgia comorbid with anxiety disorders and depression: combined medical and psychological treatment.

Authors:  Marcio Bernik; Thiago P A Sampaio; Lucas Gandarela
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2013-09

2.  Primary care consultations about medically unexplained symptoms: how do patients indicate what they want?

Authors:  Peter Salmon; Adele Ring; Gerry M Humphris; John C Davies; Christopher F Dowrick
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-01-23       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Barriers to the diagnosis of somatoform disorders in primary care: protocol for a systematic review of the current status.

Authors:  Alexandra M Murray; Anne Toussaint; Astrid Althaus; Bernd Löwe
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2013-11-08

4.  Symptoms as the main problem in primary care: A cross-sectional study of frequency and characteristics.

Authors:  Marianne Rosendal; Anders Helles Carlsen; Mette Trøllund Rask; Grete Moth
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 2.581

5.  Testing a Model of Consultation-based Reassurance and Back Pain Outcomes With Psychological Risk as Moderator: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Nicola Holt; Gemma Mansell; Jonathan C Hill; Tamar Pincus
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 3.442

6.  Helpful explanatory models for somatoform symptoms (HERMES): study protocol of a randomised mixed-methods pilot trial.

Authors:  Paul Hüsing; Bernd Löwe; Tim C Olde Hartman; Lisbeth Frostholm; Angelika Weigel
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Why do general practitioners decline training to improve management of medically unexplained symptoms?

Authors:  Peter Salmon; Sarah Peters; Rebecca Clifford; Wendy Iredale; Linda Gask; Anne Rogers; Christopher Dowrick; John Hughes; Richard Morriss
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Multiple perspectives on symptom interpretation in primary care research.

Authors:  Marianne Rosendal; Dorte Ejg Jarbøl; Anette Fischer Pedersen; Rikke Sand Andersen
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 2.497

9.  Can training in empathetic validation improve medical students' communication with patients suffering pain? A test of concept.

Authors:  Steven J Linton; Ida K Flink; Emma Nilsson; Sara Edlund
Journal:  Pain Rep       Date:  2017-04-30
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.