Literature DB >> 16574196

Risk-based ecological soil quality criteria for the characterization of contaminated soils. Combination of chemical and biological tools.

María Dolores Fernández1, María Milagrosa Vega, José Vicente Tarazona.   

Abstract

This paper describes the development of soil quality criteria for the characterization of soils focused on the potential risk to the ecosystem. The approach combines both Generic Soil Quality standards (GSQs) for individual chemicals and direct ecotoxicity assays on soil samples taken from the site. Criteria establish three main risk levels with their corresponding trigger values. The trigger values to determine high risk or "polluted" soils are exclusively based on direct toxicity assessments. The trigger values for the other categories are established by a combination of the application of GSQs and the results of bioassays. Low-risk is assumed when no toxicity is observed and GSQs based on precautionary ecotoxicity thresholds are not exceeded; high-risk must be considered if acute toxicity above the proposed trigger value is observed in soil or leachate samples. In between these levels, the risk cannot be elucidated and a site-specific assessment is required. The GSQs take into account the current or future land use, thus defining three categories: industrial soils, urban/residential soils and natural/agricultural/forest soils, each of them with different ecological requirements. The GSQ values are established following an inverse risk assessment methodology, integrating ecotoxicity and exposure models and setting the soil levels associated to pre-established criteria for the assumption of low risk. The proposed methodology covers all relevant ecological receptors and processes, soil organisms, potential contamination of ground and surface waters, and exposure of terrestrial vertebrates due to bioaccumulation and biomagnification. Exposure routes and protection criteria are defined in each protection goal. The relevance of each receptor and route is established according to the land use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16574196     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.01.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  5 in total

1.  Water-extractable priority contaminants in LUFA 2.2 soil: back to basics, contextualisation and implications for use as natural standard soil.

Authors:  A C Bastos; M Prodana; J M M Oliveira; C F Calhôa; M J G Santos; A M V M Soares; S Loureiro
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Phytotoxic effects of sewage sludge extracts on the germination of three plant species.

Authors:  Wilson A Ramírez; Xavier Domene; Pilar Andrés; Josep M Alcañiz
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  Use of the land snail Helix aspersa for monitoring heavy metal soil contamination in Northeast Algeria.

Authors:  R Larba; N Soltani
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Heavy metal accumulation and ecosystem engineering by two common mine site-nesting ant species: implications for pollution-level assessment and bioremediation of coal mine soil.

Authors:  Shbbir R Khan; Satish K Singh; Neelkamal Rastogi
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  Deriving Soil Quality Criteria of Chromium Based on Species Sensitivity Distribution Methodology.

Authors:  Yuxia Liu; Qixing Zhou; Yi Wang; Siwen Cheng; Weiduo Hao
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2021-03-16
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.