Literature DB >> 16574122

Management of cervical stab wounds in low volume trauma centres: systematic physical examination and low threshold for adjunctive studies, or surgical exploration.

Toni-Karri Pakarinen1, Ari Leppäniemi, Eero Sihvo, Kari-Matti Hiltunen, Jarmo Salo.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In Nordic countries penetrating neck injuries (PNIs) are infrequent and management has traditionally been guided by surgeons' preferences. Some form of selective non-operative approach is currently practised in most urban trauma centres.
OBJECTIVE: To examine demographic features and treatment outcome of non-ballistic penetrating neck injuries in southern Finland and provide management guidelines for centres with low volume of penetrating neck trauma.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 85 platysma penetrating neck injuries in two southern Finland hospitals (Helsinki University Central Hospital, HUCH and Tampere University Hospital, TaUH) was carried out using the ICD-10 based hospital databases to identify PNI-patients.
RESULTS: The incidence of admitted patients with penetrating neck injuries was 1.3/100000/year. Fifty-two (61%) injuries were caused by random acts of violence, 28 (38%) were self-inflicted and 5 (6%) were accidents. Of all 85 patients, 52 (61%) underwent operative exploration with a negative exploration rate of 65%. Hard signs for vascular or aerodigestive trauma were present in 23 (27%) patients and all of these were operated with a negative exploration rate of 30%. Two patients had no hard signs on physical examination but were operatively explored and significant injuries were found in both patients. The hospital mortality rate was 0% and the overall complication rate for operated patients was 7.7%.
CONCLUSIONS: Trauma centres managing PNIs infrequently should have an individually tailored management protocol for penetrating neck injury patients. If mandatory exploration is not practised, a systematic physical examination should be the mainstay of diagnostic work up but the threshold for adjunctive studies should be low. Although not evident by the current data, protocol-based management could be useful in decreasing treatment variation and enhancing residency training.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16574122     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2006.01.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  5 in total

1.  Role of Physical Examination in Decision Making for Selective Exploration in Patients with Penetrating Zone II Neck Injury.

Authors:  Seyed Vahid Hosseini; Babak Sabet; Abbas Rezaianzadeh; Leila Ghahramani; Seyed Hossein Hosseini; Alireza Safarpour; Salar Rahimikazerooni
Journal:  Bull Emerg Trauma       Date:  2013-04

2.  Analysis of 203 patients with penetrating neck injuries.

Authors:  Max Thoma; Pradeep H Navsaria; Sorin Edu; Andrew J Nicol
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Changing incidence and management of penetrating neck injuries in the South East London trauma centre.

Authors:  R Harris; C Olding; C Lacey; R Bentley; K M Schulte; D Lewis; N Kandasamy; R Oakley
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  Safety in selective surgical exploration in penetrating neck trauma.

Authors:  Frederico Teixeira; Carlos Augusto Metidieri Menegozzo; Sérgio Dias do Couto Netto; Renato S Poggeti; Francisco de Sales Collet E Silva; Dario Birolini; Celso de Oliveira Bernini; Edivaldo Massazo Utiyama
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Penetrating neck injuries: the point of plain films.

Authors:  Nicholas Hope; Gillian Gray; Michal Lesay; Ekambar Reddy
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2016-01-06
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.