Literature DB >> 16574041

Estimation of symptom-free days in generalized anxiety disorder.

George J Wan1, Huabin F Zhang, Michael A Tedeschi, David Hackett.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The efficacy of treatments for generalized anxiety disorder has usually been measured in terms of response or remission of symptoms. These endpoints, however, may not adequately capture the transient periods of symptom abatement and relapse characteristic of chronic psychiatric disorders. Here, we evaluate the measurement of treatment effectiveness in terms of the number of symptom-free days (SFDs). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A pooled analysis was performed of data from five manufacturer-initiated trials of venlafaxine extended-release (XR) in patients with generalized anxiety disorder without co-morbid major depressive disorder. The trials were randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled and of 8 weeks duration (total intent-to-treat population 1295 venlafaxine XR, 544 placebo). Two of the studies had extensions up to 6 months (intent-to-treat population 514 venlafaxine XR, 253 placebo). The patients were >or= 18 years of age with a Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A) score of >or= 18. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: SFDs were estimated using weekly scores on the HAM-A. Values of 7 and 0 SFDs, respectively, were assigned to each week the patient had a HAM-A score of <or= 7 (the remission threshold) and >or= 18 (the minimum threshold for anxiety). Fractional SFD values were assigned proportionately to weekly HAM-A scores between 7 and 18.
RESULTS: The median (inter-quartile range) SFDs were 19 (2-36) for venlafaxine XR and 10 (0-27) for placebo in the 8-week studies (p < 0.0001). In the 6-month extension studies the SFDs were 102 (27-139) for venlafaxine XR and 36 (0-94) for placebo (p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: SFDs differentiate between active treatment and placebo in clinical trials and may be an appropriate measure of treatment effectiveness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16574041     DOI: 10.1185/030079906X96245

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin        ISSN: 0300-7995            Impact factor:   2.580


  3 in total

1.  Identifying HAM-A cutoffs for mild, moderate, and severe generalized anxiety disorder.

Authors:  Louis S Matza; Robert Morlock; Chris Sexton; Karen Malley; Douglas Feltner
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 4.035

2.  Cost-effectiveness of pregabalin versus venlafaxine in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder: findings from a Spanish perspective.

Authors:  Montserrat Vera-Llonch; Ellen Dukes; Javier Rejas; Oleg Sofrygin; Marko Mychaskiw; Gerry Oster
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2009-06-09

3.  A cost-utility analysis of pregabalin versus venlafaxine XR in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder in Portugal.

Authors:  Luís Silva Miguel; Nuno Silva Miguel; Mónica Inês
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2013-04-12
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.