Literature DB >> 16572564

Construct validity and dimensional structure of the ASIA motor scale.

Daniel E Graves1, Ronald G Frankiewicz, William H Donovan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/
OBJECTIVE: The use of the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) motor score as an outcome measure requires metrological study. This paper tests the hypothesis that a more accurate representation of motor function is obtained using separate upper and lower extremity scales rather than combining all 20 key muscle ratings into a single ASIA motor score.
METHODS: We analyzed archived data from 6116 ASIA motor scale records extracted from the National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center Database.
RESULTS: The hypothesis that separate scales more accurately represent motor function than a single motor scale was supported (chi2(difference) = 2596; df=1; P < 0.0001). Two scales account for 87% of the variance, whereas a single scale accounts for only 82%. Lower extremity function is well represented in both solutions; however, upper extremity function is accurately represented only with the use of 2 separate scales.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of components of the ASIA standards for other than classification of spinal cord injury needs study. Several lines of study converge to provide strong support for the existence of 2 distinctive dimensions underlying the ASIA motor scale. The use of a single motor score in spinal cord injury research should be questioned and justified to the extent possible. The use of upper and lower extremity scales will lead to a reduction in measurement error when the motor score is used as an outcome measure. The confirmation of 2 separate dimensions underlying the ASIA motor score will enable more accurate representation of motor function in spinal cord injury research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16572564      PMCID: PMC1864793          DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2006.11753855

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med        ISSN: 1079-0268            Impact factor:   1.985


  9 in total

1.  International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Ralph J Marino; Tarcisio Barros; Fin Biering-Sorensen; Stephen P Burns; William H Donovan; Daniel E Graves; Michael Haak; Lesley M Hudson; Michael M Priebe
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.985

2.  Motor classification of spinal cord injuries with mobility, morbidity and recovery indices.

Authors:  J T Lucas; T B Ducker
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 0.688

3.  Motor recovery following spinal cord injury associated with cervical spondylosis: a collaborative study.

Authors:  R L Waters; R H Adkins; I H Sie; J S Yakura
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 2.772

Review 4.  Pharmacological interventions for acute spinal cord injury.

Authors:  M B Bracken
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2000

5.  Recovery of motor function after spinal-cord injury--a randomized, placebo-controlled trial with GM-1 ganglioside.

Authors:  F H Geisler; F C Dorsey; W P Coleman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-06-27       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Metric properties of the ASIA motor score: subscales improve correlation with functional activities.

Authors:  Ralph J Marino; Daniel E Graves
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.966

7.  Motor recovery following spinal cord injury caused by stab wounds: a multicenter study.

Authors:  R L Waters; I Sie; R H Adkins; J S Yakura
Journal:  Paraplegia       Date:  1995-02

8.  Postrehabilitation outcomes after spinal cord injury caused by firearms and motor vehicle crash among ethnically diverse groups.

Authors:  R L Waters; R H Adkins; I Sie; J Cressy
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.966

9.  Injury pattern effect on motor recovery after traumatic spinal cord injury.

Authors:  R L Waters; I Sie; R H Adkins; J S Yakura
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 3.966

  9 in total
  12 in total

Review 1.  Towards guidelines for evaluation of measures: an introduction with application to spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Mark V Johnston; Daniel E Graves
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.985

2.  En bloc spondylectomy in patients older than 60 years: indications, results and complications in a series of 37 patients.

Authors:  Carmine Zoccali; Gennaro Scotto; Luca Cannavò; Jacopo Baldi; Ulrica Scaffidi-Argentina; Alessandro Luzzati
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Intramedullary Lesion Length on Postoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging is a Strong Predictor of ASIA Impairment Scale Grade Conversion Following Decompressive Surgery in Cervical Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Bizhan Aarabi; Charles A Sansur; David M Ibrahimi; J Marc Simard; David S Hersh; Elizabeth Le; Cara Diaz; Jennifer Massetti; Noori Akhtar-Danesh
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 4.654

4.  Improving Upper Extremity Strength, Function, and Trunk Stability Using Wide-Pulse Functional Electrical Stimulation in Combination With Functional Task-Specific Practice.

Authors:  Candace Tefertiller; Patricia Bartelt; Maureen Stobelaar; Susie Charlifue; Mitch Sevigny; Eric Vande Griend; Meghan Rozwod
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2022-01-14

Review 5.  Spinal cord injury: how can we improve the classification and quantification of its severity and prognosis?

Authors:  Vibhor Krishna; Hampton Andrews; Abhay Varma; Jacobo Mintzer; Mark S Kindy; James Guest
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 5.269

Review 6.  Assessment of impairment in patients with acute traumatic spinal cord injury: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Julio C Furlan; Vanessa Noonan; Anoushka Singh; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 5.269

7.  Lower urinary tract autonomic dysfunction evaluation in spinal cord injury patients: an applied example.

Authors:  Hamza Mustafa Beano; Michael Kennelly
Journal:  Spinal Cord Ser Cases       Date:  2017-12-14

8.  Syndromics: a bioinformatics approach for neurotrauma research.

Authors:  Adam R Ferguson; Ellen D Stück; Jessica L Nielson
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 6.829

9.  Phase 1 Safety Trial of Autologous Human Schwann Cell Transplantation in Chronic Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Katie L Gant; James D Guest; Anne E Palermo; Aditya Vedantam; George Jimsheleishvili; Mary Bartlett Bunge; Adriana E Brooks; Kim D Anderson; Christine K Thomas; Andrea J Santamaria; Monica A Perez; Rosie Curiel; Mark S Nash; Efrat Saraf-Lavi; Damien D Pearse; Eva Widerström-Noga; Aisha Khan; W Dalton Dietrich; Allan D Levi
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 4.869

10.  Lower Extremity Motor Function Following Complex Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: Two-Year Follow-up in the Scoli-RISK-1 Prospective, Multicenter, International Study.

Authors:  Lawrence G Lenke; Christopher I Shaffrey; Leah Y Carreon; Kenneth M C Cheung; Benny T Dahl; Michael G Fehlings; Christopher P Ames; Oheneba Boachie-Adjei; Mark B Dekutoski; Khaled M Kebaish; Stephen J Lewis; Yukihiro Matsuyama; Hossein Mehdian; Ferran Pellisé; Yong Qiu; Frank J Schwab
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 5.284

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.