OBJECTIVES: To assess the validity, feasibility, and acceptability of 2 methods of self-sampling compared to clinician sampling during a speculum examination. GOAL: To improve screening for reproductive tract infections (RTIs) in resource-poor settings. STUDY DESIGN:In a public clinic in Cape Town, 450 women underwent a speculum examination and were randomized to self-sample with either a tampon or vaginal swabs. All specimens were tested for the same pathogens using the same diagnostic tests. RESULTS: Self-sampling resulted in satisfactory validity for N gonorrhoeae, C trachomatis, bacterial vaginosis, and Candida species (tampons and swabs) and high-risk human papillomavirus (swabs only) when tested with molecular tests or microscopy, but not for T vaginalis by culture. Self-sampling was feasible and acceptable, but some women preferred speculum examinations, which allow the clinician to view the vagina and cervix. CONCLUSIONS: Although self-sampling should not replace speculum examinations in all circumstances, it should be explored further as an RTI screening strategy.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: To assess the validity, feasibility, and acceptability of 2 methods of self-sampling compared to clinician sampling during a speculum examination. GOAL: To improve screening for reproductive tract infections (RTIs) in resource-poor settings. STUDY DESIGN: In a public clinic in Cape Town, 450 women underwent a speculum examination and were randomized to self-sample with either a tampon or vaginal swabs. All specimens were tested for the same pathogens using the same diagnostic tests. RESULTS: Self-sampling resulted in satisfactory validity for N gonorrhoeae, C trachomatis, bacterial vaginosis, and Candida species (tampons and swabs) and high-risk human papillomavirus (swabs only) when tested with molecular tests or microscopy, but not for T vaginalis by culture. Self-sampling was feasible and acceptable, but some women preferred speculum examinations, which allow the clinician to view the vagina and cervix. CONCLUSIONS: Although self-sampling should not replace speculum examinations in all circumstances, it should be explored further as an RTI screening strategy.
Authors: Rebecca M Brotman; Johan H Melendez; Tukisa D Smith; Noya Galai; Jonathan M Zenilman Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Heidi E Jones; Bruce R Allan; Janneke H H M van de Wijgert; Lydia Altini; Sylvia M Taylor; Alana de Kock; Nicol Coetzee; Anna-Lise Williamson Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2007-04-04 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Shameem Z Jaumdally; Heidi E Jones; Donald R Hoover; Hoyam Gamieldien; Jean-Mari Kriek; Nontokozo Langwenya; Landon Myer; Jo-Ann S Passmore; Catherine S Todd Journal: Am J Reprod Immunol Date: 2017-01-23 Impact factor: 3.886
Authors: Christine L Roberts; Jonathan M Morris; Kristen R Rickard; Warwick B Giles; Judy M Simpson; George Kotsiou; Jennifer R Bowen Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2011-03-11 Impact factor: 3.007
Authors: Victoria Crofts; Emmanuel Flahault; Pierre-Marie Tebeu; Sarah Untiet; Gisèle Kengne Fosso; Michel Boulvain; Pierre Vassilakos; Patrick Petignat Journal: Int J Womens Health Date: 2015-02-02