N Kochar1, D Tripathi, H Ireland, D N Redhead, P C Hayes. 1. Department of Hepatology, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, 51 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh EH16 4SU, UK. nkochar@staffmail.ed.ac.uk
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Post-transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent shunt (TIPSS) hepatic encephalopathy (HE) can occur in up to one third of patients. In 5%, this can be refractory to optimal medical treatment and may require shunt modification. The efficacy of shunt modification has been poorly studied. AIMS: To evaluate the efficacy of and natural history following TIPSS modification for treatment of refractory HE. METHODS: From a dedicated database, we selected and further studied patients who had TIPSS modification for refractory HE. RESULTS: Over a 14 year period, of 733 TIPSS insertions, 211(29%) patients developed HE post-TIPSS. In 38 patients, shunt modification (reduction (n = 9) and occlusion (n = 29)) was performed for refractory HE. Indications for TIPSS were: variceal bleeding (n = 32), refractory ascites (n = 5), and other (n = 1). Child's grades A, B, and C were noted in 11%, 47%, and 42% of cases, respectively. HE improved in 58% of patients and remained unchanged or worsened in 42%, with similar results for occlusions and reductions. Following shunt modification, variceal bleeding recurred in three patients and ascites in three. Twenty five patients have died (liver related in 15) at a median duration of 10.2 months. Three patients died due to procedure related complications following shunt occlusions (mesenteric infarction (n = 2) and septicaemia (n = 1)). Median survival of patients whose HE did not improve following shunt modification was 79 days compared with 278 days in patients whose did (p<0.05). No variables independently predicted response to shunt modification. CONCLUSIONS: TIPSS modification is a useful option for patients with refractory HE following TIPSS insertion. Due to the significant risk of iatrogenic complications with shunt occlusions, shunt reduction is a safer and preferred option.
BACKGROUND: Post-transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent shunt (TIPSS) hepatic encephalopathy (HE) can occur in up to one third of patients. In 5%, this can be refractory to optimal medical treatment and may require shunt modification. The efficacy of shunt modification has been poorly studied. AIMS: To evaluate the efficacy of and natural history following TIPSS modification for treatment of refractory HE. METHODS: From a dedicated database, we selected and further studied patients who had TIPSS modification for refractory HE. RESULTS: Over a 14 year period, of 733 TIPSS insertions, 211(29%) patients developed HE post-TIPSS. In 38 patients, shunt modification (reduction (n = 9) and occlusion (n = 29)) was performed for refractory HE. Indications for TIPSS were: variceal bleeding (n = 32), refractory ascites (n = 5), and other (n = 1). Child's grades A, B, and C were noted in 11%, 47%, and 42% of cases, respectively. HE improved in 58% of patients and remained unchanged or worsened in 42%, with similar results for occlusions and reductions. Following shunt modification, variceal bleeding recurred in three patients and ascites in three. Twenty five patients have died (liver related in 15) at a median duration of 10.2 months. Three patients died due to procedure related complications following shunt occlusions (mesenteric infarction (n = 2) and septicaemia (n = 1)). Median survival of patients whose HE did not improve following shunt modification was 79 days compared with 278 days in patients whose did (p<0.05). No variables independently predicted response to shunt modification. CONCLUSIONS: TIPSS modification is a useful option for patients with refractory HE following TIPSS insertion. Due to the significant risk of iatrogenic complications with shunt occlusions, shunt reduction is a safer and preferred option.
Authors: M Rössle; P Deibert; K Haag; A Ochs; M Olschewski; V Siegerstetter; K H Hauenstein; R Geiger; C Stiepak; W Keller; H E Blum Journal: Lancet Date: 1997-04-12 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: W Nolte; J Wiltfang; C Schindler; H Münke; K Unterberg; U Zumhasch; H R Figulla; G Werner; H Hartmann; G Ramadori Journal: Hepatology Date: 1998-11 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: R K Kerlan; J M LaBerge; E L Baker; J P Wack; M Marx; K A Somberg; R L Gordon; E J Ring Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 1995 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: K A Somberg; J L Riegler; J M LaBerge; M M Doherty-Simor; P Bachetti; J P Roberts; J R Lake Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 1995-04 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Hui Juan Chen; Gang Zheng; Julian L Wichmann; U Joseph Schoepf; Guang Ming Lu; Long Jiang Zhang Journal: Metab Brain Dis Date: 2015-09-24 Impact factor: 3.584
Authors: Justin R Boike; Bartley G Thornburg; Sumeet K Asrani; Michael B Fallon; Brett E Fortune; Manhal J Izzy; Elizabeth C Verna; Juan G Abraldes; Andrew S Allegretti; Jasmohan S Bajaj; Scott W Biggins; Michael D Darcy; Maryjane A Farr; Khashayar Farsad; Guadalupe Garcia-Tsao; Shelley A Hall; Caroline C Jadlowiec; Michael J Krowka; Jeanne Laberge; Edward W Lee; David C Mulligan; Mitra K Nadim; Patrick G Northup; Riad Salem; Joseph J Shatzel; Cathryn J Shaw; Douglas A Simonetto; Jonathan Susman; K Pallav Kolli; Lisa B VanWagner Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2021-07-15 Impact factor: 13.576
Authors: Dhiraj Tripathi; Adrian J Stanley; Peter C Hayes; Simon Travis; Matthew J Armstrong; Emmanuel A Tsochatzis; Ian A Rowe; Nicholas Roslund; Hamish Ireland; Mandy Lomax; Joanne A Leithead; Homoyon Mehrzad; Richard J Aspinall; Joanne McDonagh; David Patch Journal: Gut Date: 2020-02-29 Impact factor: 23.059