Sabu S Padmadas1, José G Dias, Frans J Willekens. 1. Division of Social Statistics & Southampton Statistical Sciences Research Institute, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK. ssp@socsci.soton.ac.uk
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the degree of individual heterogeneity related to complex dietary behaviour and to further examine the associations of different dietary compositions with selected characteristics. DESIGN: Latent class analysis was applied to data from the recent cross-sectional National Family Health Survey that collected information on the intake frequency of selected foods. Different responses regarding intake frequency were condensed into a set of five meaningful latent clusters representing different dietary patterns and these clusters were then labelled based on the reported degree of diet mixing. SETTING: Indian states. Subjects In total, 90,180 women aged 15-49 years. RESULTS: Three clusters were predominantly non-vegetarian and two were vegetarian. A very high or high mixed-diet pattern was observed particularly in the southern and a few north-eastern states. Many women in the very high mixed-diet cluster consumed mostly non-green/leafy vegetables on a daily basis, and fruits and other non-vegetarian diet on a weekly basis. In contrast, those in the low mixed-diet cluster consumed more than three-fifths of the major vegetarian diet ingredients alone on a daily basis. The affluent group that represented the low mixed-diet cluster were primarily vegetarians and those who represented the very high mixed-diet cluster were mostly non-vegetarians. The significant interrelationships of different characteristics highlight not only socio-economic, spatial and cultural disparities related to dietary practices, but also the substantial heterogeneity in diet mixing behaviour. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study confirmed our hypothesis of heterogeneous dietary behaviour of Indian women and yielded useful policy-oriented results which might be difficult to establish otherwise.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the degree of individual heterogeneity related to complex dietary behaviour and to further examine the associations of different dietary compositions with selected characteristics. DESIGN: Latent class analysis was applied to data from the recent cross-sectional National Family Health Survey that collected information on the intake frequency of selected foods. Different responses regarding intake frequency were condensed into a set of five meaningful latent clusters representing different dietary patterns and these clusters were then labelled based on the reported degree of diet mixing. SETTING: Indian states. Subjects In total, 90,180 women aged 15-49 years. RESULTS: Three clusters were predominantly non-vegetarian and two were vegetarian. A very high or high mixed-diet pattern was observed particularly in the southern and a few north-eastern states. Many women in the very high mixed-diet cluster consumed mostly non-green/leafy vegetables on a daily basis, and fruits and other non-vegetarian diet on a weekly basis. In contrast, those in the low mixed-diet cluster consumed more than three-fifths of the major vegetarian diet ingredients alone on a daily basis. The affluent group that represented the low mixed-diet cluster were primarily vegetarians and those who represented the very high mixed-diet cluster were mostly non-vegetarians. The significant interrelationships of different characteristics highlight not only socio-economic, spatial and cultural disparities related to dietary practices, but also the substantial heterogeneity in diet mixing behaviour. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study confirmed our hypothesis of heterogeneous dietary behaviour of Indian women and yielded useful policy-oriented results which might be difficult to establish otherwise.
Authors: Carrie D Patnode; Leslie A Lytle; Darin J Erickson; John R Sirard; Daheia J Barr-Anderson; Mary Story Journal: J Phys Act Health Date: 2011-05
Authors: Chantel L Martin; Anna Maria Siega-Riz; Daniela Sotres-Alvarez; Whitney R Robinson; Julie L Daniels; Eliana M Perrin; Alison M Stuebe Journal: J Nutr Date: 2016-09-28 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Daniela Sotres-Alvarez; Anna Maria Siega-Riz; Amy H Herring; Suzan L Carmichael; Marcia L Feldkamp; Charlotte A Hobbs; Andrew F Olshan Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2013-05-02 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Chantel L Martin; Anna Maria Siega-Riz; Daniela Sotres-Alvarez; Whitney R Robinson; Julie L Daniels; Eliana M Perrin; Alison M Stuebe Journal: Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol Date: 2016-02-05 Impact factor: 3.980
Authors: Carmelia Alae-Carew; Pauline Scheelbeek; Rodrigo M Carrillo-Larco; Antonio Bernabé-Ortiz; William Checkley; J Jaime Miranda Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2019-08-28 Impact factor: 4.539