Literature DB >> 16570592

Ethanol's energy return on investment: a survey of the literature 1990-present.

Roel Hammerschlag1.   

Abstract

Various authors have reported conflicting values for the energy return on investment (rE) of ethanol manufacture. Energy policy analysts predisposed to or against ethanol frequently cite selections from these studies to supporttheir positions. This literature review takes an objective look at the disagreement by normalizing and comparing the data sets from ten such studies. Six of the reviewed studies treat starch ethanol from corn, and four treat cellulosic ethanol. Each normalized data set is also submitted to a uniform calculation of rEdefined as the total product energy divided by nonrenewable energy input to its manufacture. Defined this way rE > 1 indicates that the ethanol product has nominally captured at least some renewable energy, and rE > 0.76 indicates that it consumes less nonrenewable energy in its manufacture than gasoline. The reviewed corn ethanol studies imply 0.84 < or = rE < or = 1.65; three of the cellulosic ethanol studies imply 4.40 < or = rE < or = 6.61. The fourth cellulosic ethanol study reports rE= 0.69 and may reasonably be considered an outlier.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16570592     DOI: 10.1021/es052024h

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  8 in total

1.  Comparing scales of environmental effects from gasoline and ethanol production.

Authors:  Esther S Parish; Keith L Kline; Virginia H Dale; Rebecca A Efroymson; Allen C McBride; Timothy L Johnson; Michael R Hilliard; Jeffrey M Bielicki
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2012-12-02       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Dynamic Linking of Upstream Energy and Freight Demands for Bio and Fossil Energy Pathways in the Global Change Analysis Model.

Authors:  Jon Sampedro; Page Kyle; Christopher W Ramig; Daniel Tanner; Jonathan E Huster; Marshall A Wise
Journal:  Appl Energy       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 11.446

3.  Genome-scale metabolic analysis of Clostridium thermocellum for bioethanol production.

Authors:  Seth B Roberts; Christopher M Gowen; J Paul Brooks; Stephen S Fong
Journal:  BMC Syst Biol       Date:  2010-03-22

4.  Net energy of cellulosic ethanol from switchgrass.

Authors:  M R Schmer; K P Vogel; R B Mitchell; R K Perrin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-01-07       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Cellulase production from spent lignocellulose hydrolysates by recombinant Aspergillus niger.

Authors:  Björn Alriksson; Shaunita H Rose; Willem H van Zyl; Anders Sjöde; Nils-Olof Nilvebrant; Leif J Jönsson
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Bioenergy and African transformation.

Authors:  Lee R Lynd; Mariam Sow; Annie Fa Chimphango; Luis Ab Cortez; Carlos H Brito Cruz; Mosad Elmissiry; Mark Laser; Ibrahim A Mayaki; Marcia Afd Moraes; Luiz Ah Nogueira; Gideon M Wolfaardt; Jeremy Woods; Willem H van Zyl
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 6.040

7.  Ionic Liquid-Mediated Homogeneous Esterification of Cinnamic Anhydride to Xylans.

Authors:  Guihua Yang; Huifang Zhou; Jiachuan Chen; Gaojin Lyu; Yuanyuan Xia; Lucian A Lucia
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  At the core of the socio-ecological transition: Agroecosystem energy fluxes in Austria 1830-2010.

Authors:  Simone Gingrich; Fridolin Krausmann
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 7.963

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.