Literature DB >> 16569392

Current approaches in familial colorectal cancer: a clinical perspective.

Patrick M Lynch1.   

Abstract

Individuals with a family history of colorectal cancer or colorectal adenomas have an increased risk for colorectal cancer. When no hereditary syndrome is evident, screening is based on empiric risk estimates. The risk is greatest for individuals with specific inherited cancer-predisposing disorders. When conditions such as familial adenomatous polyposis or hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer are diagnosed, specific neoplasm risk estimates can usually be performed based on advances in molecular genetics. These estimates lead to more straightforward and cost-effective approaches to surveillance and management. The National Comprehensive Cancer Center Network (NCCN) and other groups have provided detailed guidelines for evaluating patients based on recognition of clinical syndrome characteristics, followed by appropriate genetic counseling, genetic testing, and optimal surveillance. The NCCN guidelines are used as a frame of reference for this discussion of selected recent advances in human cancer genetics as they apply to clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16569392     DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2006.0034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw        ISSN: 1540-1405            Impact factor:   11.908


  4 in total

1.  Looking to the future: incorporating genomic information into disparities research to reduce measurement error and selection bias.

Authors:  Alexandra E Shields; William H Crown
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Uncertainty in the utility of immunohistochemistry in mismatch repair protein expression in epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Domenico Coppola; Santo V Nicosia; Andrea Doty; Thomas A Sellers; Ji-Hyun Lee; Jimmy Fulp; Zachary Thompson; Sanja Galeb; John McLaughlin; Steven A Narod; Joellen Schildkraut; Tuya Pal
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.480

3.  The FAP self-concept scale (adult form).

Authors:  Mary Jane Esplen; Noreen Stuckless; Terri Berk; Kate Butler; Steve Gallinger
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 2.375

4.  Frequency of mutations in mismatch repair genes in a population-based study of women with ovarian cancer.

Authors:  T Pal; M R Akbari; P Sun; J-H Lee; J Fulp; Z Thompson; D Coppola; S Nicosia; T A Sellers; J McLaughlin; H A Risch; B Rosen; P Shaw; J Schildkraut; S A Narod
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 7.640

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.