Literature DB >> 16569323

Which patients with recurrent implantation failure after IVF benefit from PGD for aneuploidy screening?

P Platteau1, C Staessen, A Michiels, A Van Steirteghem, I Liebaers, P Devroey.   

Abstract

Patients with recurrent IVF failure are defined as patients who are younger than 37 years and who had at least three consecutive unsuccessful IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles with good quality embryos. These patients might be predisposed to chromosome errors in their embryos and therefore might benefit from preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening (PGD-AS). This technique is, however, expensive and some normal embryos might be lost due to the error rate. The aim of this retrospective study was to define those patients who would benefit most from it. One hundred and twenty-one first PGD-AS cycles for recurrent IVF failure were analysed. The aneuploidy rate, 'no embryo transfer' rate, live birth rate per embryo transfer and implantation rate were respectively 48.3, 22.3, 29.7 and 19.5%. A multivariate logistic regression analysis gave us a predictive model demonstrating that to have a 90% probability of having an embryo transfer after PGD-AS, the patient should have at least 10 mature oocytes, eight normally fertilized oocytes and six embryos for biopsy. This study suggests that most patients with recurrent IVF failure may benefit from PGD-AS. Future studies, however, should more strictly define this heterogeneous group of patients, so that comparison is easier.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16569323     DOI: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)61006-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online        ISSN: 1472-6483            Impact factor:   3.828


  4 in total

1.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: does age of onset matter (anymore)?

Authors:  Timothy Krahn
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2008-11-01

2.  Association between amino acid turnover and chromosome aneuploidy during human preimplantation embryo development in vitro.

Authors:  Helen M Picton; Kay Elder; Franchesca D Houghton; Judith A Hawkhead; Anthony J Rutherford; Jan E Hogg; Henry J Leese; Sarah E Harris
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 4.025

3.  Contemporary genetic technologies and female reproduction.

Authors:  B C J M Fauser; K Diedrich; P Bouchard; F Domínguez; M Matzuk; S Franks; S Hamamah; C Simón; P Devroey; D Ezcurra; C M Howles
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 15.610

4.  Associations among morphological parameters, clinical factors and euploid blastocyst formation.

Authors:  João Paolo Bilibio; Pânila Longhi Lorenzzoni; Brenda Mendes de Oliveira; Flora Leal Nascimento; Arivaldo José Conceição Meireles; Fábio Costa do Nascimento
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2022-04-17
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.