Literature DB >> 16569113

Patients' information needs and decision-making processes: what can be learned from genetic counselees?

Shoshana Shiloh1, Liora Gerad, Boleslav Goldman.   

Abstract

This field study investigated the information needs and decision-making strategies of 161 genetic counselees interviewed just prior to counseling. Patients were interested mostly in information about the outcomes and consequences of the alternative options at their disposal and about measures to defuse the risks. They wanted mainly information stated with certainty and were less interested in probability information. There was no difference in the search for information between the alternative eventually chosen and the one not chosen. There was a difference, however, among types of decisions and the interest in the various categories of information. These findings were interpreted within the theoretical model of decision making in natural risky situations (O. Huber, 1997). Practical implications for shared medical decision making are presented. 2006 APA, all rights reserved

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16569113     DOI: 10.1037/0278-6133.25.2.211

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Psychol        ISSN: 0278-6133            Impact factor:   4.267


  7 in total

1.  Explaining Mendelian inheritance in genetic consultations: an IPR study of counselor and counselee experiences.

Authors:  Theodora Gale; Sara Pasalodos-Sanchez; Lauren Kerzin-Storrar; Georgina Hall; Rhona MacLeod
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-01-05       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Personalized genomic results: analysis of informational needs.

Authors:  Tara J Schmidlen; Lisa Wawak; Rachel Kasper; J Felipe García-España; Michael F Christman; Erynn S Gordon
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Living with hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer; experiences from and impact of genetic testing.

Authors:  C Carlsson; M Nilbert
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-08-18       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Making the decision to participate in predictive genetic testing for arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  April Manuel; Fern Brunger
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  A randomized experimental study to test the effects of discussing uncertainty during cancer genetic counseling: different strategies, different outcomes?

Authors:  Niki M Medendorp; Marij A Hillen; Leonie N C Visser; Cora M Aalfs; Floor A M Duijkers; Klaartje van Engelen; Margreet G E M Ausems; Senno Verhoef; Anne M Stiggelbout; Ellen M A Smets
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 5.351

6.  Experience of Emergency Department Patients With Using the Talking Pole Device: Prospective Interventional Descriptive Study.

Authors:  Junsang Yoo; Ji Yeong Soh; Wan Hyoung Lee; Dong Kyung Chang; Se Uk Lee; Won Chul Cha
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 4.773

7.  The Latent Perception of Pregnancy.

Authors:  Leah Borovoi; Shoshana Shiloh; Lailah Alidu; Ivo Vlaev
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-03-24
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.