Literature DB >> 16568748

Environmental risks of nanotechnology: National Nanotechnology Initiative funding, 2000-2004.

Katherine A Dunphy Guzmán1, Margaret R Taylor, Jillian F Banfield.   

Abstract

By considering risk in the early stages of a technology, costs of identifying important health and environmental impacts after a technology has widely diffused can be avoided. Nanotechnology, involving materials and objects less than 100 nm in size, is an important case in point. In this paper we analyze the research priorities discussed by various interest groups concerned with the environmental risks of nanotechnology, evaluate the distribution of federal environmental nanotechnology R&D funding, and discuss research in this field. Overall federal environmental R&D funding to date is limited and focuses more on the positive environmental applications of nanotechnology than on basic knowledge/research, tools for nanoenvironmental research, or the potential risks of nanotechnology. The situation began to change in 2004 when a significant increase occurred in federal R&D funding for the environmental implications of engineered nanomaterials. Though literature exits on the exposure, transport, and toxicity of incidental nanoparticles, little work has been published on the environmental risks of engineered nanoparticles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16568748     DOI: 10.1021/es0515708

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  32 in total

1.  Toxicity and genotoxicity of organic and inorganic nanoparticles to the bacteria Vibrio fischeri and Salmonella typhimurium.

Authors:  I Lopes; R Ribeiro; F E Antunes; T A P Rocha-Santos; M G Rasteiro; A M V M Soares; F Gonçalves; R Pereira
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Utility of a new bolus-injectable nanoparticle for clinical cancer staging.

Authors:  Mukesh Harisinghani; Robert W Ross; Alexander R Guimaraes; Ralph Weissleder
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 5.715

Review 3.  Environmental behavior and ecotoxicity of engineered nanoparticles to algae, plants, and fungi.

Authors:  Enrique Navarro; Anders Baun; Renata Behra; Nanna B Hartmann; Juliane Filser; Ai-Jun Miao; Antonietta Quigg; Peter H Santschi; Laura Sigg
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  Population level effects of multiwalled carbon nanotubes in Daphnia magna exposed to pulses of triclocarban.

Authors:  Anne Simon; Thomas G Preuss; Andreas Schäffer; Henner Hollert; Hanna M Maes
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2015-05-24       Impact factor: 2.823

5.  Solar-assisted photodegradation of isoproturon over easily recoverable titania catalysts.

Authors:  A Tolosana-Moranchel; J Carbajo; M Faraldos; A Bahamonde
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  In vivo evaluation of carbon fullerene toxicity using embryonic zebrafish.

Authors:  Crystal Y Usenko; Stacey L Harper; Robert L Tanguay
Journal:  Carbon N Y       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 9.594

7.  Beyond Implications and Applications: the Story of 'Safety by Design'

Authors:  Christopher M Kelty
Journal:  Nanoethics       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 0.917

8.  Assessment of the In Vivo Toxicity of Gold Nanoparticles.

Authors:  Yu-Shiun Chen; Yao-Ching Hung; Ian Liau; G Steve Huang
Journal:  Nanoscale Res Lett       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 4.703

Review 9.  Nanotechnology, nanotoxicology, and neuroscience.

Authors:  Won Hyuk Suh; Kenneth S Suslick; Galen D Stucky; Yoo-Hun Suh
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 11.685

Review 10.  Ecotoxicity of engineered nanoparticles to aquatic invertebrates: a brief review and recommendations for future toxicity testing.

Authors:  A Baun; N B Hartmann; K Grieger; K O Kusk
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2008-04-19       Impact factor: 2.823

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.