Literature DB >> 16568439

Presence of unfavorable cytogenetic abnormalities is the strongest predictor of poor survival in secondary myelofibrosis.

David Dingli1, Susan M Schwager, Ruben A Mesa, Chin-Yang Li, Gordon W Dewald, Ayalew Tefferi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Postpolycythemic (PV) and postthrombocythemic (ET) myeloid metaplasia are consensually referred to as secondary myelofibrosis (sMF). Prognostic variables in sMF are not as well defined as they are for de novo myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia (MMM), which is also known as agnogenic myeloid metaplasia (AMM). Such information is particularly crucial for management decisions in transplant-eligible patients.
METHODS: Diagnoses of PV and ET required fulfillment of the World Health Organization criteria for the diagnosis of MMM as well as an antecedent history of either polycythemia vera or essential thrombocythemia that was supported by bone marrow examination. Cytogenetic findings were classified as being either favorable (normal or isolated 13q- or 20q- clones) or unfavorable (presence of abnormalities other than 13q- and 20q-).
RESULTS: The study population was comprised of 66 young patients (age <60 yrs) with sMF, including 37 patients with PV and 29 patients with ET. Multivariate analysis of parameters other than cytogenetics identified older age (P = .02), anemia (hemoglobin level <10 g/dL [P = .007]), and PV (P = .009) to be independent risk factors for shortened survival. However, when such analysis was restricted to patients in whom cytogenetic studies were performed (n = 31 patients), the presence of unfavorable cytogenetic abnormalities (i.e., clones other than 20q- and 13q-) became the only adverse prognostic factor for survival (P = .001). A similar analysis in a temporal cohort of 50 age-matched patients with AMM also identified unfavorable cytogenetics as an independent predictor of poor survival, along with thrombocytopenia and anemia.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current study suggest that cytogenetic findings might supersede AMM-derived prognostic scoring systems for predicting survival in patients with sMF.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16568439     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.21868

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  18 in total

1.  The International Prognostic Scoring System does not accurately discriminate different risk categories in patients with post-essential thrombocythemia and post-polycythemia vera myelofibrosis.

Authors:  Juan-Carlos Hernández-Boluda; Arturo Pereira; Montse Gómez; Concepción Boqué; Francisca Ferrer-Marín; José-María Raya; Valentín García-Gutiérrez; Ana Kerguelen; Blanca Xicoy; Pere Barba; Jesús Martínez; Elisa Luño; Alberto Alvarez-Larrán; Joaquín Martínez-López; Elisa Arbelo; Carles Besses
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 2.  SOHO State-of-the-Art Update and Next Questions: MPN.

Authors:  Prithviraj Bose; Jason Gotlib; Claire N Harrison; Srdan Verstovsek
Journal:  Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk       Date:  2018-01

Review 3.  Therapeutic potential of Janus-activated kinase-2 inhibitors for the management of myelofibrosis.

Authors:  Srdan Verstovsek
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 4.  Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for myelofibrosis in the era of JAK inhibitors.

Authors:  Vikas Gupta; Parameswaran Hari; Ronald Hoffman
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 5.  Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia.

Authors:  William J Hogan; Mark R Litzow; Ayalew Tefferi
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.952

6.  New and old prognostic factors in polycythemia vera.

Authors:  Francesco Passamonti
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.952

7.  A Rare Presentation of Extramedullary Hematopoiesis in Post-polycythemic Myelofibrosis.

Authors:  Ceyla Konca Degertekin; Zübeyde Nur Ozkurt; Nalan Akyürek; Münci Yağcı
Journal:  Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 0.900

8.  Proposed criteria for response assessment in patients treated in clinical trials for myeloproliferative neoplasms in blast phase (MPN-BP): formal recommendations from the post-myeloproliferative neoplasm acute myeloid leukemia consortium.

Authors:  John Mascarenhas; Mark L Heaney; Vesna Najfeld; Elizabeth Hexner; Omar Abdel-Wahab; Raajit Rampal; Farhad Ravandi; Bruce Petersen; Gail Roboz; Eric Feldman; Nikolai Podoltsev; Dan Douer; Ross Levine; Martin Tallman; Ronald Hoffman
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 3.156

9.  Phase 2 study of CEP-701, an orally available JAK2 inhibitor, in patients with primary or post-polycythemia vera/essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis.

Authors:  Fabio P S Santos; Hagop M Kantarjian; Nitin Jain; Taghi Manshouri; Deborah A Thomas; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Debra Kennedy; Zeev Estrov; Jorge Cortes; Srdan Verstovsek
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 22.113

10.  The natural history and treatment outcome of blast phase BCR-ABL- myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Authors:  Constantine S Tam; Roberto M Nussenzveig; Uday Popat; Carlos E Bueso-Ramos; Deborah A Thomas; Jorge A Cortes; Richard E Champlin; Stefan E Ciurea; Taghi Manshouri; Sherry M Pierce; Hagop M Kantarjian; Srdan Verstovsek
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2008-06-19       Impact factor: 22.113

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.