Hans-Georg Kopp1, Carlos A Ramos, Shahin Rafii. 1. Department of Genetic Medicine, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York 10021, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: During the last several years, a substantial amount of evidence from animal as well as human studies has advanced our knowledge of how bone marrow derived cells contribute to neoangiogenesis. In the light of recent findings, we may have to redefine our thinking of endothelial cells as well as of perivascular mural cells. RECENT FINDINGS: Inflammatory hematopoietic cells, such as macrophages, have been shown to promote neoangiogenesis during tumor growth and wound healing. Dendritic cells, B lymphocytes, monocytes, and other immune cells have also been found to be recruited to neoangiogenic niches and to support neovessel formation. These findings have led to the concept that subsets of hematopoietic cells comprise proangiogenic cells that drive adult revascularization processes. While evidence of the importance of endothelial progenitor cells in adult vasculogenesis increased further, the role of these comobilized hematopoietic cells has been intensely studied in the last few years. SUMMARY: Angiogenic factors promote mobilization of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1-positive hematopoietic cells through matrix metalloproteinase-9 mediated release of soluble kit-ligand and recruit these proangiogenic cells to areas of hypoxia, where perivascular mural cells present stromal-derived factor 1 (CXCL-12) as an important retention signal. The same factors are possibly involved in mobilization of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2-positive endothelial precursors that may participate in neovessel formation. The complete characterization of mechanisms, mediators and signaling pathways involved in these processes will provide novel targets for both anti and proangiogenic therapeutic strategies.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: During the last several years, a substantial amount of evidence from animal as well as human studies has advanced our knowledge of how bone marrow derived cells contribute to neoangiogenesis. In the light of recent findings, we may have to redefine our thinking of endothelial cells as well as of perivascular mural cells. RECENT FINDINGS: Inflammatory hematopoietic cells, such as macrophages, have been shown to promote neoangiogenesis during tumor growth and wound healing. Dendritic cells, B lymphocytes, monocytes, and other immune cells have also been found to be recruited to neoangiogenic niches and to support neovessel formation. These findings have led to the concept that subsets of hematopoietic cells comprise proangiogenic cells that drive adult revascularization processes. While evidence of the importance of endothelial progenitor cells in adult vasculogenesis increased further, the role of these comobilized hematopoietic cells has been intensely studied in the last few years. SUMMARY: Angiogenic factors promote mobilization of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1-positive hematopoietic cells through matrix metalloproteinase-9 mediated release of soluble kit-ligand and recruit these proangiogenic cells to areas of hypoxia, where perivascular mural cells present stromal-derived factor 1 (CXCL-12) as an important retention signal. The same factors are possibly involved in mobilization of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2-positive endothelial precursors that may participate in neovessel formation. The complete characterization of mechanisms, mediators and signaling pathways involved in these processes will provide novel targets for both anti and proangiogenic therapeutic strategies.
Authors: Brock A Peters; Luis A Diaz; Kornelia Polyak; Leslie Meszler; Kathy Romans; Eva C Guinan; Joseph H Antin; David Myerson; Stanley R Hamilton; Bert Vogelstein; Kenneth W Kinzler; Christoph Lengauer Journal: Nat Med Date: 2005-02-20 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Yuval Shaked; Francesco Bertolini; Shan Man; Michael S Rogers; Dave Cervi; Thomas Foutz; Kimberley Rawn; Daniel Voskas; Daniel J Dumont; Yaacov Ben-David; Jack Lawler; Jack Henkin; Jim Huber; Daniel J Hicklin; Robert J D'Amato; Robert S Kerbel Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: T Asahara; H Masuda; T Takahashi; C Kalka; C Pastore; M Silver; M Kearne; M Magner; J M Isner Journal: Circ Res Date: 1999-08-06 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: T Asahara; T Takahashi; H Masuda; C Kalka; D Chen; H Iwaguro; Y Inai; M Silver; J M Isner Journal: EMBO J Date: 1999-07-15 Impact factor: 11.598
Authors: Shuguang Jiang; Luke Walker; Michael Afentoulis; Daniel A Anderson; Linda Jauron-Mills; Christopher L Corless; William H Fleming Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2004-11-17 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Benjamin Levi; Emily R Nelson; Jeong S Hyun; Jason P Glotzbach; Shuli Li; Allison Nauta; Daniel T Montoro; Min Lee; George C Commons; Shijun Hu; Joseph C Wu; Geoffrey C Gurtner; Michael T Longaker Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 4.730
Authors: Daniel J Nolan; Alessia Ciarrocchi; Albert S Mellick; Jaspreet S Jaggi; Kathryn Bambino; Sunita Gupta; Emily Heikamp; Michael R McDevitt; David A Scheinberg; Robert Benezra; Vivek Mittal Journal: Genes Dev Date: 2007-06-15 Impact factor: 11.361
Authors: Derick Okwan-Duodu; Laura Hansen; Giji Joseph; Alicia N Lyle; Daiana Weiss; David R Archer; W Robert Taylor Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2018-03-15 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: Zhican Qu; Sabrina Van Ginkel; Anshu M Roy; Louise Westbrook; Mubina Nasrin; Yulia Maxuitenko; Andra R Frost; Delicia Carey; Wenquan Wang; Rongbao Li; William E Grizzle; Jaideep V Thottassery; Francis G Kern Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2008-08-01 Impact factor: 12.701