OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationships among negative attributions of friend reactions (NAFRs) within a social context, anticipated adherence difficulties, diabetes stress, and metabolic control. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A sample of 104 adolescents with type 1 diabetes completed instruments measuring demographics, attribution of friend reactions, anticipated adherence, and diabetes stress. Metabolic control was measured by HbA(1c) obtained during the clinic visit. RESULTS: Path analysis demonstrated an excellent fit of a model depicting an indirect relationship between NAFRs and metabolic control through the mechanisms of expected adherence difficulties and diabetes stress. CONCLUSIONS: Adolescents who make NAFRs are likely to find adherence difficult in social situations and have increased feelings of stress, with the latter associated with poorer metabolic control. Intervention efforts to address negative attributions may impact adherence behavior and feelings of stress, especially if specific contexts of self-care behavior are taken into account.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationships among negative attributions of friend reactions (NAFRs) within a social context, anticipated adherence difficulties, diabetes stress, and metabolic control. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A sample of 104 adolescents with type 1 diabetes completed instruments measuring demographics, attribution of friend reactions, anticipated adherence, and diabetes stress. Metabolic control was measured by HbA(1c) obtained during the clinic visit. RESULTS: Path analysis demonstrated an excellent fit of a model depicting an indirect relationship between NAFRs and metabolic control through the mechanisms of expected adherence difficulties and diabetes stress. CONCLUSIONS: Adolescents who make NAFRs are likely to find adherence difficult in social situations and have increased feelings of stress, with the latter associated with poorer metabolic control. Intervention efforts to address negative attributions may impact adherence behavior and feelings of stress, especially if specific contexts of self-care behavior are taken into account.
Authors: Yang Lu; Elizabeth A Pyatak; Anne L Peters; Jamie R Wood; Michele Kipke; Marisa Cohen; Paola A Sequeira Journal: Diabetes Educ Date: 2014-11-13 Impact factor: 2.140
Authors: Ariana M Chao; Karl E Minges; Chorong Park; Susan Dumser; Kathryn M Murphy; Margaret Grey; Robin Whittemore Journal: J Pediatr Health Care Date: 2015-07-30 Impact factor: 1.812
Authors: Shelagh A Mulvaney; Korey K Hood; David G Schlundt; Chandra Y Osborn; Kevin B Johnson; Russell L Rothman; Kenneth A Wallston Journal: Diabetes Res Clin Pract Date: 2011-07-07 Impact factor: 5.602
Authors: Heather D Lehmkuhl; Lisa J Merlo; Katie Devine; Jared Gaines; Eric A Storch; Janet H Silverstein; Gary R Geffken Journal: J Clin Psychol Med Settings Date: 2009-04-22
Authors: Jessica T Markowitz; Tara Cousineau; Debra L Franko; Alan T Schultz; Meredith Trant; Rachel Rodgers; Lori M B Laffel Journal: J Diabetes Sci Technol Date: 2014-06-22