OBJECTIVE: To determine whether using the chronic care model (CCM) in an underserved community leads to improved clinical and behavioral outcomes for people with diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This multilevel, cluster-design, randomized controlled trial examined the effectiveness of a CCM-based intervention in an underserved urban community. Eleven primary care practices, along with their patients, were randomized to three groups: CCM intervention (n = 30 patients), provider education only (PROV group) (n = 38), and usual care (UC group) (n = 51). RESULTS: A marked decline in HbA(1c) was observed in the CCM group (-0.6%, P = 0.008) but not in the other groups. The magnitude of the association remained strong after adjustment for clustering (P = 0.01). The same pattern was observed for a decline in non-HDL cholesterol and for the proportion of participants who self-monitor blood glucose in the CCM group (non-HDL cholesterol: -10.4 mg/dl, P = 0.24; self-monitor blood glucose: +22.2%, P < 0.0001), with statistically significant between-group differences in improvement (non-HDL cholesterol: P = 0.05; self-monitor blood glucose: P = 0.03) after adjustment. The CCM group also showed improvement in HDL cholesterol (+5.5 mg/dl, P = 0.0004), diabetes knowledge test scores (+6.7%, P = 0.07), and empowerment scores (+2, P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that implementing the CCM in the community is effective in improving clinical and behavioral outcomes in patients with diabetes.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether using the chronic care model (CCM) in an underserved community leads to improved clinical and behavioral outcomes for people with diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This multilevel, cluster-design, randomized controlled trial examined the effectiveness of a CCM-based intervention in an underserved urban community. Eleven primary care practices, along with their patients, were randomized to three groups: CCM intervention (n = 30 patients), provider education only (PROV group) (n = 38), and usual care (UC group) (n = 51). RESULTS: A marked decline in HbA(1c) was observed in the CCM group (-0.6%, P = 0.008) but not in the other groups. The magnitude of the association remained strong after adjustment for clustering (P = 0.01). The same pattern was observed for a decline in non-HDL cholesterol and for the proportion of participants who self-monitor blood glucose in the CCM group (non-HDL cholesterol: -10.4 mg/dl, P = 0.24; self-monitor blood glucose: +22.2%, P < 0.0001), with statistically significant between-group differences in improvement (non-HDL cholesterol: P = 0.05; self-monitor blood glucose: P = 0.03) after adjustment. The CCM group also showed improvement in HDL cholesterol (+5.5 mg/dl, P = 0.0004), diabetes knowledge test scores (+6.7%, P = 0.07), and empowerment scores (+2, P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that implementing the CCM in the community is effective in improving clinical and behavioral outcomes in patients with diabetes.
Authors: Pamela A Ohman Strickland; Shawna V Hudson; Alicja Piasecki; Karissa Hahn; Deborah Cohen; A John Orzano; Michael L Parchman; Benjamin F Crabtree Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2010 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.657
Authors: Bijal A Balasubramanian; Sabrina M Chase; Paul A Nutting; Deborah J Cohen; Pamela A Ohman Strickland; Jesse C Crosson; William L Miller; Benjamin F Crabtree Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2010 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Andrea Cherrington; Guadalupe X Ayala; John P Elder; Elva M Arredondo; Mona Fouad; Isabel Scarinci Journal: Ethn Dis Date: 2010 Impact factor: 1.847
Authors: Kensaku Kawamoto; Kevin J Anstrom; John B Anderson; Hayden B Bosworth; David F Lobach; Carrie McAdam-Marx; Jeffrey M Ferranti; Howard Shang; Kimberly S H Yarnall Journal: AMIA Annu Symp Proc Date: 2017-02-10
Authors: Gary T Ko; Wing-Yee So; Peter C Tong; Francois Le Coguiec; Debborah Kerr; Greg Lyubomirsky; Beaver Tamesis; Troels Wolthers; Jennifer Nan; Juliana Chan Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Date: 2010-05-13 Impact factor: 2.796
Authors: Latifa M Baynouna; Amal I Shamsan; Tahira A Ali; Lolowa A Al Mukini; Moza H Al Kuwiti; Thuraya A Al Ameri; Nico J D Nagelkerke; Ahmad M Abusamak; Nader M Ahmed; Sanaa M Zein Al Deen; Tariq M Jaber; Abdulkarim M Elkhalid; Anthony D Revel; Alhusini I Al Husaini; Fouad A Nour; Hayat O Ahmad; Mohammad K Nazirudeen; Rowaya Al Dhahiri; Yahya O Zain Al Abdeen; Aziza O Omar Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2010-02-22 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Liesbeth Borgermans; Geert Goderis; Carine Van Den Broeke; Geert Verbeke; An Carbonez; Anna Ivanova; Chantal Mathieu; Bert Aertgeerts; Jan Heyrman; Richard Grol Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2009-10-07 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Martha M Funnell; Tammy L Brown; Belinda P Childs; Linda B Haas; Gwen M Hosey; Brian Jensen; Melinda Maryniuk; Mark Peyrot; John D Piette; Diane Reader; Linda M Siminerio; Katie Weinger; Michael A Weiss Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 19.112