Literature DB >> 16567772

Traditional versus up-front [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography staging of non-small-cell lung cancer: a Dutch cooperative randomized study.

Gerarda J M Herder1, Henk Kramer, Otto S Hoekstra, Egbert F Smit, Jan Pruim, Harm van Tinteren, Emile F Comans, Paul Verboom, Carin A Uyl-de Groot, Alle Welling, Marinus A Paul, Maarten Boers, Pieter E Postmus, Gerrit J Teule, Harry J M Groen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We investigated whether application of positron emission tomography (PET) immediately after first presentation might simplify staging while maintaining accuracy, as compared with traditional strategy in routine clinical setting.
METHODS: At first presentation, patients with a provisional diagnosis of lung cancer without overt dissemination were randomly assigned to traditional work-up (TWU) according to international guidelines or early PET followed by histologic/cytologic verification of lesions, or imaging and follow-up. Patients with [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose (18FDG) -avid, noncentral tumors without suspicion of mediastinal or distant metastases on PET proceeded directly to thoracotomy. Follow-up in presumed benign lesions was at least 12 months. In patients treated with surgery or neoadjuvant therapy, the quality of staging was measured by comparing the clinical stage to the final stage (combination of peroperative staging and 6 months of follow-up). To investigate test substitution, we analyzed the number of (non)invasive tests to achieve clinical TNM staging, and its associated costs.
RESULTS: Between 1999 and 2001, 465 patients (233 TWU, 232 PET) were enrolled at 22 hospitals. The mean (standard deviation) number of procedures to finalize staging was equal in the TWU arm and the PET arm: 7.9 (2.0) v 7.9 (1.9), P = .90, respectively. Mediastinoscopies occurred significantly less often in the PET arm. Agreement between clinical and final stage was good in both arms (kappa = .85 v .78; P = .07). Costs did not differ significantly.
CONCLUSION: Up-front 18FDG-PET in patients with (suspected) lung cancer does not reduce the overall number of diagnostic test, but it maintains quality of TNM staging with the use of less invasive surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16567772     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.02.4695

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  32 in total

Review 1.  What is quality, and can we define it in lung cancer?-the case for quality improvement.

Authors:  Farhood Farjah; Frank C Detterbeck
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2015-08

2.  The Netherlands protocol for standardisation and quantification of FDG whole body PET studies in multi-centre trials.

Authors:  Ronald Boellaard; Wim J G Oyen; Corneline J Hoekstra; Otto S Hoekstra; Eric P Visser; Antoon T Willemsen; Bertjan Arends; Fred J Verzijlbergen; Josee Zijlstra; Anne M Paans; Emile F I Comans; Jan Pruim
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Imaging: PET-CT imaging in non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Mark Levine; Jim Julian
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 4.  Is stereotactic ablative radiotherapy an alternative to surgery in operable stage I non-small cell lung cancer?

Authors:  Andrea Riccardo Filippi; Pierfrancesco Franco; Umberto Ricardi
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2013-07-01

5.  PET-CT in the staging and treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Patricia Ibeas; Blanca Cantos; José Manuel Gasent; Begoña Rodríguez; Mariano Provencio
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.405

6.  Lung cancer staging: the value of PET depends on the clinical setting.

Authors:  Frank C Detterbeck; Santiago Figueroa Almanzar
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 7.  The role of endobronchial ultrasound versus mediastinoscopy for non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Katarzyna Czarnecka-Kujawa; Kazuhiro Yasufuku
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  Radiotherapy for a second primary lung cancer arising post-pneumonectomy: planning considerations and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Sashendra Senthi; Cornelis J A Haasbeek; Frank J Lagerwaard; Wilko F Verbakel; Patricia F de Haan; Ben J Slotman; Suresh Senan
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 9.  A systematic review of PET and PET/CT in oncology: a way to personalize cancer treatment in a cost-effective manner?

Authors:  Astrid Langer
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Positron emission tomography in the management of lung cancer.

Authors:  Vahid Reza Dabbagh Kakhki
Journal:  Ann Thorac Med       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.219

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.