Literature DB >> 1656740

Multicenter evaluation of azithromycin and cefaclor in acute lower respiratory tract infections.

D Dark1.   

Abstract

This was a randomized, third-party-blinded, multicenter study that compared once-daily azithromycin (500 mg on day 1, followed by 250 mg on days 2-5) to cefaclor (500 mg three times daily for 10 days) in the treatment of patients with acute bronchitis or pneumonia. A total of 546 patients were entered into the study and 272 patients were evaluable for efficacy analysis. Of these, 249 (176 azithromycin, 73 cefaclor) had bronchitis and 23 (15 azithromycin, 8 cefaclor) had pneumonia. The combined clinical cure and improvement rate, as determined by the investigator, was 96% for azithromycin and 94% for cefaclor, with 88% bacteriologic eradication in both treatment groups. The elimination of Haemophilus influenzae was significantly better with azithromycin (94.5%) than with cefaclor (61.1%) (p less than 0.001; Fisher's exact two-tail test). The two antibiotics were well tolerated during this study; the incidence of side effects reported was similar for azithromycin and cefaclor. Approximately two thirds of the side effects were mild. Only minor abnormalities in the screening laboratory tests were noted. This study shows that a 5-day course of once-daily azithromycin is as effective as a 10-day three times daily course of cefaclor in the treatment of patients with acute lower respiratory tract infections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1656740     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9343(91)90399-i

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  8 in total

1.  Comparison of cefdinir and cefaclor in treatment of community-acquired pneumonia.

Authors:  M Drehobl; P Bianchi; C H Keyserling; K J Tack; T J Griffin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Pharmacokinetics of azithromycin administered alone and with atovaquone in human immunodeficiency virus-infected children. The ACTG 254 Team.

Authors:  L Y Ngo; R Yogev; W M Dankner; W T Hughes; S Burchett; J Xu; B Sadler; J D Unadkat
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 3.  Choosing the right macrolide antibiotic. A guide to selection.

Authors:  L Charles; J Segreti
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Azithromycin. A review of its antimicrobial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and clinical efficacy.

Authors:  D H Peters; H A Friedel; D McTavish
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Double-blind randomized study comparing the efficacies and safeties of a short (3-day) course of azithromycin and a 5-day course of amoxicillin in patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.

Authors:  J C Mertens; P W van Barneveld; H R Asin; E Ligtvoet; M R Visser; T Branger; A I Hoepelman
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 6.  The new macrolides. Azithromycin and clarithromycin.

Authors:  M S Kanatani; B J Guglielmo
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1994-01

Review 7.  Antibiotics for community-acquired pneumonia in adult outpatients.

Authors:  Smita Pakhale; Sunita Mulpuru; Theo J M Verheij; Michael M Kochen; Gernot G U Rohde; Lise M Bjerre
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-10-09

8.  Azithromycin Versus Beta-lactams in Hospitalized Patients with Acute Exacerbations of COPD.

Authors:  Nour Baalbaki; Christopher Giuliano; Carrie L Hartner; Pramodini Kale-Pradhan; Leonard Johnson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 5.128

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.