BACKGROUND: Ventricular tachycardia (VT) resulting from arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) may be difficult to differentiate from idiopathic right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) VT. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate the hypothesis that QRS characteristics would be different in ARVC because of altered conduction through abnormal myocardium. METHODS: In 24 RVOT VT patients (18 women and 6 men; age 42 +/- 10 years) and 20 ARVC patients (12 women and 8 men; age 38 +/- 14 years), mean QRS duration, frontal plane axis, and precordial R-wave transition were measured in 12-lead ECGs recorded during VT. RESULTS: Mean QRS duration was longer in all 12 leads in ARVC patients. A significant difference was noted in leads I, III, aVL, aVF, V(1), V(2), and V(3) (P <.05). Leads I and aVL had the largest mean difference between ARVC and RVOT VT patients of 17.6 +/- 4.7 ms and 15.8 +/- 7.5 ms, respectively (P <.0001). Lead I QRS duration > or =120 ms had a sensitivity of 100%, specificity 46%, positive predictive value 61%, and negative predictive value 100% for ARVC. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.89. The addition of mean QRS axis <30 degrees (R<S in lead III) to the above criterion increased specificity for ARVC to 100%. QRS duration remained sensitive and specific in the subgroup of nine ARVC ECGs with an inferior axis (ROC area 0.82). R-wave transition was not different between groups. CONCLUSION: QRS duration is longer in ARVC compared with RVOT VT. An algorithm combining lead I QRS duration for sensitivity and axis for specificity is useful for differentiating the two tachycardia substrates.
BACKGROUND:Ventricular tachycardia (VT) resulting from arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) may be difficult to differentiate from idiopathic right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) VT. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate the hypothesis that QRS characteristics would be different in ARVC because of altered conduction through abnormal myocardium. METHODS: In 24 RVOT VTpatients (18 women and 6 men; age 42 +/- 10 years) and 20 ARVC patients (12 women and 8 men; age 38 +/- 14 years), mean QRS duration, frontal plane axis, and precordial R-wave transition were measured in 12-lead ECGs recorded during VT. RESULTS: Mean QRS duration was longer in all 12 leads in ARVC patients. A significant difference was noted in leads I, III, aVL, aVF, V(1), V(2), and V(3) (P <.05). Leads I and aVL had the largest mean difference between ARVC and RVOT VTpatients of 17.6 +/- 4.7 ms and 15.8 +/- 7.5 ms, respectively (P <.0001). Lead I QRS duration > or =120 ms had a sensitivity of 100%, specificity 46%, positive predictive value 61%, and negative predictive value 100% for ARVC. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.89. The addition of mean QRS axis <30 degrees (R<S in lead III) to the above criterion increased specificity for ARVC to 100%. QRS duration remained sensitive and specific in the subgroup of nine ARVC ECGs with an inferior axis (ROC area 0.82). R-wave transition was not different between groups. CONCLUSION: QRS duration is longer in ARVC compared with RVOT VT. An algorithm combining lead I QRS duration for sensitivity and axis for specificity is useful for differentiating the two tachycardia substrates.
Authors: Frank I Marcus; William J McKenna; Duane Sherrill; Cristina Basso; Barbara Bauce; David A Bluemke; Hugh Calkins; Domenico Corrado; Moniek G P J Cox; James P Daubert; Guy Fontaine; Kathleen Gear; Richard Hauer; Andrea Nava; Michael H Picard; Nikos Protonotarios; Jeffrey E Saffitz; Danita M Yoerger Sanborn; Jonathan S Steinberg; Harikrishna Tandri; Gaetano Thiene; Jeffrey A Towbin; Adalena Tsatsopoulou; Thomas Wichter; Wojciech Zareba Journal: Circulation Date: 2010-02-19 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Frank I Marcus; William J McKenna; Duane Sherrill; Cristina Basso; Barbara Bauce; David A Bluemke; Hugh Calkins; Domenico Corrado; Moniek G P J Cox; James P Daubert; Guy Fontaine; Kathleen Gear; Richard Hauer; Andrea Nava; Michael H Picard; Nikos Protonotarios; Jeffrey E Saffitz; Danita M Yoerger Sanborn; Jonathan S Steinberg; Harikrishna Tandri; Gaetano Thiene; Jeffrey A Towbin; Adalena Tsatsopoulou; Thomas Wichter; Wojciech Zareba Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2010-02-19 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Byron Gottschalk; Michael Gysel; Raimundo Barbosa-Barros; Ricardo Paulo De Sousa Rocha; Andrés Ricardo Pérez-Riera; Li Zhang; Guy Fontaine; Adrian Baranchuk Journal: Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol Date: 2014-03-05 Impact factor: 1.468